As Feds Mull Pot Policy, Cannabis Lawyers Convene in Denver
More than 150 attorneys, including many from the Bay Area, will be in Denver on Friday for the National Cannabis Bar Association's first-ever Cannabis Law Institute. The two-day event at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law will put a spotlight on the business of marijuana law, a reflection of new client opportunities for firms that want a piece of the legalized recreational and medical industry.
July 27, 2017 at 06:54 PM
6 minute read
More than 150 attorneys, including many from the San Francisco Bay Area, will be in Denver on Friday for the National Cannabis Bar Association's first Cannabis Law Institute.
The two-day event at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law will put a spotlight on the business of marijuana law, a reflection of new client opportunities for firms that want a piece of the legalized recreational and medical industry.
“We wanted to make the event applicable to everybody,” said Chris Davis, executive director of the Oakland-based cannabis bar. “Our attendees really span the spectrum.”
Topics at the event will focus on the evaluation of legal risks for marijuana business clients, intellectual property protection, federal taxation concerns and the ethics of representing cannabis operations.
Attendees will also be keeping an eye on events in Washington. A U.S. Senate committee on Thursday voted to renew an annual budget bill rider, known as the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment, that bars the U.S. Justice Department from spending money on prosecuting medical marijuana dispensaries operating legally at the state level. U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions had asked congressional leaders in May not to extend the ban.
Sessions was also expected to soon release a report that would include recommended changes to federal marijuana policies. In a statement released late Wednesday, however, Sessions said he will act on the report's recommendations on a “rolling basis.” He did not detail the report's findings, according to The Hill.
“It's important that cannabis lawyers be talking to each other,” Portland attorney Leland Berger, a board member on the NCBA, recently said on the Cannabis Industry Voice podcast. “It's important that we provide education so that the quality of service is high. It's also important because … in some jurisdictions, the fact of practicing or wanting to practice in this area is problematic.”
The bar association is monitoring the case against San Diego attorney Jessica McElfresh, who faces felony charges in connection with the alleged operation of a hash oil and manufacturing and distribution operation run by a client. The case hinges on an email between McElfresh and her client, a communication that McElfresh's supporters say should be protected by attorney-client privilege.
“Our concern as an organization is the chilling effect this prosecution could have [on] cannabis attorneys who advise on compliance issues,” Berger said.
Speakers and panelists at the conference include Robert Raich, the Oakland attorney who has argued two marijuana legalization cases before the U.S. Supreme Court; Henry Wykowski, the veteran medical dispensary attorney from San Francisco's Wykowski & Associates; Lara DeCaro, a business attorney and mediator from Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick in San Francisco and Matt Hausman, associate area counsel for the IRS office of chief counsel.
The National Cannabis Bar Association was launched in 2015 and currently has about 250 members.
More than 150 attorneys, including many from the San Francisco Bay Area, will be in Denver on Friday for the National Cannabis Bar Association's first Cannabis Law Institute.
The two-day event at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law will put a spotlight on the business of marijuana law, a reflection of new client opportunities for firms that want a piece of the legalized recreational and medical industry.
“We wanted to make the event applicable to everybody,” said Chris Davis, executive director of the Oakland-based cannabis bar. “Our attendees really span the spectrum.”
Topics at the event will focus on the evaluation of legal risks for marijuana business clients, intellectual property protection, federal taxation concerns and the ethics of representing cannabis operations.
Attendees will also be keeping an eye on events in Washington. A U.S. Senate committee on Thursday voted to renew an annual budget bill rider, known as the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment, that bars the U.S. Justice Department from spending money on prosecuting medical marijuana dispensaries operating legally at the state level. U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions had asked congressional leaders in May not to extend the ban.
Sessions was also expected to soon release a report that would include recommended changes to federal marijuana policies. In a statement released late Wednesday, however, Sessions said he will act on the report's recommendations on a “rolling basis.” He did not detail the report's findings, according to The Hill.
“It's important that cannabis lawyers be talking to each other,” Portland attorney Leland Berger, a board member on the NCBA, recently said on the Cannabis Industry Voice podcast. “It's important that we provide education so that the quality of service is high. It's also important because … in some jurisdictions, the fact of practicing or wanting to practice in this area is problematic.”
The bar association is monitoring the case against San Diego attorney Jessica McElfresh, who faces felony charges in connection with the alleged operation of a hash oil and manufacturing and distribution operation run by a client. The case hinges on an email between McElfresh and her client, a communication that McElfresh's supporters say should be protected by attorney-client privilege.
“Our concern as an organization is the chilling effect this prosecution could have [on] cannabis attorneys who advise on compliance issues,” Berger said.
Speakers and panelists at the conference include Robert Raich, the Oakland attorney who has argued two marijuana legalization cases before the U.S. Supreme Court; Henry Wykowski, the veteran medical dispensary attorney from San Francisco's Wykowski & Associates; Lara DeCaro, a business attorney and mediator from Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick in San Francisco and Matt Hausman, associate area counsel for the IRS office of chief counsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Dismisses Microplastics Suit Against Evian's 'Natural Spring Water'
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250