As Feds Mull Pot Policy, Cannabis Lawyers Convene in Denver
More than 150 attorneys, including many from the Bay Area, will be in Denver on Friday for the National Cannabis Bar Association's first-ever Cannabis Law Institute. The two-day event at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law will put a spotlight on the business of marijuana law, a reflection of new client opportunities for firms that want a piece of the legalized recreational and medical industry.
July 27, 2017 at 06:54 PM
6 minute read
More than 150 attorneys, including many from the San Francisco Bay Area, will be in Denver on Friday for the National Cannabis Bar Association's first Cannabis Law Institute.
The two-day event at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law will put a spotlight on the business of marijuana law, a reflection of new client opportunities for firms that want a piece of the legalized recreational and medical industry.
“We wanted to make the event applicable to everybody,” said Chris Davis, executive director of the Oakland-based cannabis bar. “Our attendees really span the spectrum.”
Topics at the event will focus on the evaluation of legal risks for marijuana business clients, intellectual property protection, federal taxation concerns and the ethics of representing cannabis operations.
Attendees will also be keeping an eye on events in Washington. A U.S. Senate committee on Thursday voted to renew an annual budget bill rider, known as the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment, that bars the U.S. Justice Department from spending money on prosecuting medical marijuana dispensaries operating legally at the state level. U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions had asked congressional leaders in May not to extend the ban.
Sessions was also expected to soon release a report that would include recommended changes to federal marijuana policies. In a statement released late Wednesday, however, Sessions said he will act on the report's recommendations on a “rolling basis.” He did not detail the report's findings, according to The Hill.
“It's important that cannabis lawyers be talking to each other,” Portland attorney Leland Berger, a board member on the NCBA, recently said on the Cannabis Industry Voice podcast. “It's important that we provide education so that the quality of service is high. It's also important because … in some jurisdictions, the fact of practicing or wanting to practice in this area is problematic.”
The bar association is monitoring the case against San Diego attorney Jessica McElfresh, who faces felony charges in connection with the alleged operation of a hash oil and manufacturing and distribution operation run by a client. The case hinges on an email between McElfresh and her client, a communication that McElfresh's supporters say should be protected by attorney-client privilege.
“Our concern as an organization is the chilling effect this prosecution could have [on] cannabis attorneys who advise on compliance issues,” Berger said.
Speakers and panelists at the conference include Robert Raich, the Oakland attorney who has argued two marijuana legalization cases before the U.S. Supreme Court; Henry Wykowski, the veteran medical dispensary attorney from San Francisco's Wykowski & Associates; Lara DeCaro, a business attorney and mediator from Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick in San Francisco and Matt Hausman, associate area counsel for the IRS office of chief counsel.
The National Cannabis Bar Association was launched in 2015 and currently has about 250 members.
Related Articles:
|- California's Pot Chief Says She's Not Focusing on Feds
- Why Some California Counties Are Saying No to Commercial Cannabis
- Facebook, Shutting Down Pot Pages, Still Won't Like Marijuana
- 6 Ways California Can Entice Banks to Serve Marijuana Clients
- Burning Questions for Greenbridge Corporate Counsel's Founder
More than 150 attorneys, including many from the San Francisco Bay Area, will be in Denver on Friday for the National Cannabis Bar Association's first Cannabis Law Institute.
The two-day event at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law will put a spotlight on the business of marijuana law, a reflection of new client opportunities for firms that want a piece of the legalized recreational and medical industry.
“We wanted to make the event applicable to everybody,” said Chris Davis, executive director of the Oakland-based cannabis bar. “Our attendees really span the spectrum.”
Topics at the event will focus on the evaluation of legal risks for marijuana business clients, intellectual property protection, federal taxation concerns and the ethics of representing cannabis operations.
Attendees will also be keeping an eye on events in Washington. A U.S. Senate committee on Thursday voted to renew an annual budget bill rider, known as the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment, that bars the U.S. Justice Department from spending money on prosecuting medical marijuana dispensaries operating legally at the state level. U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions had asked congressional leaders in May not to extend the ban.
Sessions was also expected to soon release a report that would include recommended changes to federal marijuana policies. In a statement released late Wednesday, however, Sessions said he will act on the report's recommendations on a “rolling basis.” He did not detail the report's findings, according to The Hill.
“It's important that cannabis lawyers be talking to each other,” Portland attorney Leland Berger, a board member on the NCBA, recently said on the Cannabis Industry Voice podcast. “It's important that we provide education so that the quality of service is high. It's also important because … in some jurisdictions, the fact of practicing or wanting to practice in this area is problematic.”
The bar association is monitoring the case against San Diego attorney Jessica McElfresh, who faces felony charges in connection with the alleged operation of a hash oil and manufacturing and distribution operation run by a client. The case hinges on an email between McElfresh and her client, a communication that McElfresh's supporters say should be protected by attorney-client privilege.
“Our concern as an organization is the chilling effect this prosecution could have [on] cannabis attorneys who advise on compliance issues,” Berger said.
Speakers and panelists at the conference include Robert Raich, the Oakland attorney who has argued two marijuana legalization cases before the U.S. Supreme Court; Henry Wykowski, the veteran medical dispensary attorney from San Francisco's Wykowski & Associates; Lara DeCaro, a business attorney and mediator from Leland, Parachini, Steinberg, Matzger & Melnick in San Francisco and Matt Hausman, associate area counsel for the IRS office of chief counsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Dismisses Microplastics Suit Against Evian's 'Natural Spring Water'
5 minute readWho Got the Work: Saul Ewing Team Appears for Samsung Bioepis in Amgen Patent Case
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250