Sanchez v. Sessions
9th Cir.; 14-71768 The court of appeals granted a petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. The court held that the Coast…
September 05, 2017 at 05:30 PM
4 minute read
9th Cir.;
14-71768
The court of appeals granted a petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. The court held that the Coast Guard's egregious violation of an individual's Fourth Amendment rights warranted suppression of the resulting documents that were used against him at removal proceedings; further, the officers' violation of immigration regulations warranted the termination of removal proceedings.
Mexican citizen Enrique Sanchez entered the U.S. without inspection in 1988, when he was 17 years old. In 2004, he United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) granted Sanchez Family Unity Benefits, which allowed him to reside and work in the U.S.. Those benefits expired in 2006. Sanchez's application for an extension of benefits was denied in 2009 due to three misdemeanor California Veh. Code violations. Sanchez nonetheless remaining in the country. In 2010, Sanchez and some Latino friends went out fishing using Sanchez's small pleasure boat. When the engine died not far from shore, they called the U.S. Coast Guard for assistance. The responding Coast Guard officers towed Sanchez's boat back to the harbor. Upon arriving, however, the officers detained and frisked Sanchez and his friends, and demanded that they hand over their identifications and belongings. Sanchez handed his driver's license, which gave both his name and local address. Without any other information, the Coast Guard officers notified U.S. Customs and Border Protection to report “the possibility of 4 undocumented worker aliens.” Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers thereafter detained and interrogated Sanchez, strip searched him, and retained his identification and wallet. After releasing Sanchez, a CBP officer prepared a Form I-213 (Record of Deportable/Inadmissible Alien) for Sanchez. The Form I-213 included Sanchez's admission that he was undocumented and had entered the United States without inspection. The Form I-213 also stated that the Coast Guard officers had detained Sanchez based on their suspicion that he was an “undocumented worker alien.” Nine months later, Sanchez was served with a notice to appear for removal proceedings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readMango Labs Sues Ex-Employees for Over $10M After 'Egregious' Governance Nightmare
4 minute read'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
What Judicial Nominations Could Look Like Under a President Harris or Trump
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250