C.A. 2nd;
B270506
The Second Appellate District affirmed a judgment. In the published portion of its opinion, the court held that because the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 limited the scope a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses to “testimonial” statements only, it similarly limited the scope of the Aranda/Bruton doctrine.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
