This California Bill Would Restrict Immigration Enforcement in State Courts
A Los Angeles lawmaker says he'll pursue a bill in January that would bar federal immigration agents from arresting or questioning undocumented immigrants in state courthouses unless they first obtain a warrant.
September 11, 2017 at 05:58 PM
6 minute read
A Los Angeles lawmaker says he'll pursue a bill in January that would bar federal immigration agents from arresting or questioning undocumented immigrants in state courthouses unless they first obtain a warrant.
Democratic Sen. Ricardo Lara, Bell Gardens, introduced the new provisions in SB 183 late Friday, citing concerns raised by California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye earlier this year that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials were using the secure buildings of California's trial courts to “stalk” and detain undocumented immigrants.
“As the California chief justice has said, 'Courthouses should not be used as bait' for immigrant enforcement, and the same is true for schools,” Lara said in a prepared statement.
The ICE ban would apply to any state-owned or state-leased building, including K-12 schools, community colleges and universities.
“Courthouses, schools and other state offices are a refuge for millions of the most vulnerable Californians, and immigrants should not be afraid to come to court or take their children to school,” Lara said.
Lara's late amendments to the bill, SB 183, suggested he was preparing to push through the legislation in the final hours of the legislative session, which ends at midnight Friday. On Monday he announced he will hold the bill until the Legislature reconvenes in 2018 “to work with stakeholders in the fall to move the bill forward in January.”
Cantil-Sakauye in March asked U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and then-U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly to stop arresting undocumented immigrants in state courthouses, arguing that the activity was scaring away witnesses and litigants, including women seeking restraining orders.
Sessions and Kelly responded two weeks later, sharply rebuking the chief justice for accusing ICE agents of “stalking” immigrants. The U.S. officials blamed California and large counties from blocking access to suspects in prisons and jails.
ICE spokeswoman Virginia Kice said the agency could not comment on the pending legislation because it could be construed as improper lobbying. She reiterated previous comments that ICE agents make arrests in courthouses because their security screenings provide a safer environment for the public and officers.
A spokesman for judicial branch leaders said they had no position or comment on the bill.
California's Legislature and attorney general have regularly challenged Trump administration actions to crack down on immigration during his first eight months in office.
On Monday, Attorney General Xavier Becerra sued the U.S. Department of Homeland Security over the president's decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA. Also on Monday, Senate Leader Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, announced that he and Gov. Jerry Brown reached agreement on so-called sanctuary state legislation that will limit local law enforcement agencies' cooperation with federal officials on immigration actions.
Related Articles:
|- Eric Holder's Advice to Jeff Sessions: Don't Force Career Staff to 'Defend the Indefensible'
- California's Chief Justice Raises New Alarms Over Immigration Arrests at Court
- Amid Arpaio Storm, Calif. Moves to Restrict Immigration-Status Disclosure
- Jeff Sessions Swipes Calif. Chief Justice for Accusing Feds of 'Stalking' Immigrants
- California Chief Justice Accuses Feds of 'Stalking' Immigrants at Courthouses
A Los Angeles lawmaker says he'll pursue a bill in January that would bar federal immigration agents from arresting or questioning undocumented immigrants in state courthouses unless they first obtain a warrant.
Democratic Sen. Ricardo Lara, Bell Gardens, introduced the new provisions in SB 183 late Friday, citing concerns raised by California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye earlier this year that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials were using the secure buildings of California's trial courts to “stalk” and detain undocumented immigrants.
“As the California chief justice has said, 'Courthouses should not be used as bait' for immigrant enforcement, and the same is true for schools,” Lara said in a prepared statement.
The ICE ban would apply to any state-owned or state-leased building, including K-12 schools, community colleges and universities.
“Courthouses, schools and other state offices are a refuge for millions of the most vulnerable Californians, and immigrants should not be afraid to come to court or take their children to school,” Lara said.
Lara's late amendments to the bill, SB 183, suggested he was preparing to push through the legislation in the final hours of the legislative session, which ends at midnight Friday. On Monday he announced he will hold the bill until the Legislature reconvenes in 2018 “to work with stakeholders in the fall to move the bill forward in January.”
Cantil-Sakauye in March asked U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and then-U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly to stop arresting undocumented immigrants in state courthouses, arguing that the activity was scaring away witnesses and litigants, including women seeking restraining orders.
Sessions and Kelly responded two weeks later, sharply rebuking the chief justice for accusing ICE agents of “stalking” immigrants. The U.S. officials blamed California and large counties from blocking access to suspects in prisons and jails.
ICE spokeswoman
A spokesman for judicial branch leaders said they had no position or comment on the bill.
California's Legislature and attorney general have regularly challenged Trump administration actions to crack down on immigration during his first eight months in office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All9th Circuit Judge Chastises DOJ for 'Abrupt About-Face' in Case Challenging Asylum Policy
Why Fragomen Launched New Tools Amid Russia-Ukraine War
With New Leadership at the Helm, Expansion Remains Key at Berry Appleman
3 minute readSenate Confirms Araceli Martinez-Olguin to California's Northern District Bench
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250