New Class Action Claims Tesla Steals License Info From Test-Driving Customers
The lawsuit in California accuses Tesla of using information from customers' driver's licenses for marketing, without their consent or knowledge.
September 20, 2017 at 05:02 PM
3 minute read
Customers hoping to test drive a Tesla may want to think twice before handing over their license, according to a new class action lawsuit filed against Elon Musk's car company.
The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges the car company coaxes consumers into handing over personal information without their consent by scanning that information from their driver's licenses before test drives. The suit claims Tesla, along with Experian, Salesforce and app development firm Appstem, violate various consumer privacy protection laws by doing so.
The lawsuit was brought by Wayne Skiles, a California man, on behalf of consumers across the country.
“I think if even a fraction of what we're alleging is deemed true, it's a breach of the consumers trust in Tesla and [shows] how their information is being used nefariously,” said the plaintiffs attorney, Abbas Kazerounian, a founding partner at Kazerouni Law Group.
Requests for comment from Tesla, Experian and Appstem were not immediately returned. A Salesforce spokeswoman said in an email the company does not comment on pending litigation.
In the complaint, Skiles claimed he visited a Tesla showroom in Newport Beach, California, in 2015. After talking with a Tesla employee, he decided to test drive one of the cars. The Tesla employee asked to see his driver's license, which he assumed was to verify he was legally permitted to drive. The employee used an iPad to scan his license, and Skiles then entered his email address and phone number upon request, and agreed to the “Test Drive Agreement” put forth on the device.
The lawsuit alleges the Tesla employee was doing much more than verifying Skiles' license with the iPad. It claims Tesla uploads information from the magnetic strip of customers' licenses onto the iPads using an Appstem mobile app, and that information is then added to Tesla's Salesforce marketing database. Then, the complaint alleges, the information is transmitted via the database to Experian, who then provides a type of credit score based on that information back to Tesla. That data is then uses it for marketing purposes.
The lawsuit claims this scheme violations the Driver's Privacy Protection Act, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and estimates the class members could “number in the several thousands, if not substantially more.” Skiles is seeking statutory and punitive damages to be determined at trial under all three laws, meaning damages could number in the millions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTikTok Hit With California Class Action for Allegedly Mining Children's Data Without Parental Consent
Apple Agrees to Pay $95 Million Settlement in Siri Voice Assistant Privacy Class Action
Trending Stories
- 1'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions
- 2It Was the Best of Times, It Was the Worst of Times
- 3Class Action Accusing Dave's Killer Bread of Mislabeling Protein Contents Cleared to Continue, Judge Rules
- 4SEC Files Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Over Untimely Twitter Ownership Disclosure
- 5Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250