Vallejo Wins Ruling to Shut Down Medical Marijuana Dispensary
Cities have wide latitude to establish criteria for allowing marijuana dispensaries to operate, including the timely payment of business taxes, the First District Court of Appeal held.
October 02, 2017 at 03:59 PM
4 minute read
Cities have wide latitude to establish criteria for allowing marijuana dispensaries to operate, including the timely payment of business taxes, the First District Court of Appeal held.
In a unanimous ruling, a three-justice panel upheld Vallejo's request for a preliminary injunction to shut down marijuana sales at Nature's Love Collective, a nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary operated by NCORP4 Inc. Vallejo had denied the collective's application for limited immunity partly because of its earlier failure to pay city taxes.
A Solano trial court had refused to grant a preliminary injunction, finding that Vallejo's requirement that dispensaries must have a city taxpaying history to continue operating an “unconstitutional ex post facto condition.” But constitutional prohibitions on ex post facto laws don't apply to city ordinances governing dispensaries, the appellate panel said.
“Local governments may rationally limit medical marijuana dispensaries to those already in operation and compliant with prior law,” Justice Stuart Pollak wrote, “as past compliance shows a willingness to follow the law, which suggests future lawful behavior.”
Pollak's opinion was also signed by Justices Martin Jenkins and Peter Siggins.
The case stems from Vallejo's complex history with medical marijuana dispensaries since California voters approved of the drug's medicinal use in 1996 without immediately putting in place many guidelines or restrictions on its sale.
Vallejo's zoning laws have never permitted dispensaries as a legal land use. But by 2011, about 20 of the shops had opened anyway, effectively operating as public nuisances.
Vallejo had declared bankruptcy in 2008. City leaders decided they did not have the resources to shut down the dispensaries and instead placed a ballot measure before voters asking them to impose a business license tax on each medical marijuana business. Voters approved Measure C in 2011. Four years later, the city suspended the tax, finding the number of dispensaries had doubled to 40 and that taxing businesses that were illegally operating under zoning laws “tends to confuse the public as to the city's policy and undermines enforcement of the city's land use controls.”
In an attempt to cull the number of marijuana businesses operating in their city, Vallejo leaders in July 2015 enacted an ordinance that would grant “limited civil immunity” only to existing dispensaries that had regularly paid their taxes. In May 2016, Vallejo sued to shut down Nature's Love Collective because it had not received the city's immunity designation. The collective failed to pay the business license tax between 2011 and 2015, the city said.
The attorney for the collective, Scot Candell of the Law Offices of Scot Candell & Associates in San Rafael, argued that the tax-payment condition was an illegal amendment of Measure C. The collective's owners said the city should have also allowed them to pay any delinquent taxes with penalties and interest to cure its default.
The appellate court said the collective's argument “misconstrues Measure C,” which allows prosecution of violations “even if late payment is made.” The court also condoned the provision within the city's 2015 ordinance requiring a good taxpaying history from a dispensary.
A dispensary's “timely payment of business taxes provides Vallejo with a rational basis to conclude that the dispensary will continue to act in a law-abiding manner,” the court wrote. “NCORP4, which did not pay its business taxes, was reasonably denied immunity to continue operations.”
Vallejo City Attorney Claudia Quintana declined to comment Monday.
Candell said his clients had not decided whether to appeal. He did say that the facts in the case are so unique to Vallejo that “I don't see this decision having an impact on other cities.”
Proposition 64, approved by California voters last year, gives cities and counties discretion to allow or reject sales of recreational-use cannabis when that market opens in January.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Litigation Trends to Watch From Law.com Radar: Suits Strike at DEI Policies, 'Meme Coins' and Infractions in Cannabis Labeling Litigation Trends to Watch From Law.com Radar: Suits Strike at DEI Policies, 'Meme Coins' and Infractions in Cannabis Labeling](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bc/5a/820278a64294a8f3d9e0b573cb26/target-store-01-767x633.jpg)
Litigation Trends to Watch From Law.com Radar: Suits Strike at DEI Policies, 'Meme Coins' and Infractions in Cannabis Labeling
4 minute read![States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/therecorder/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/02/Donald-Trump_4-767x633-1.jpg)
![Perkins Coie Backs Challenge to Trump's Ban on Transgender Military Service Perkins Coie Backs Challenge to Trump's Ban on Transgender Military Service](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/f7/65/42dd6a6540a794dde4ff284c068c/perkins-coie-sign-767x633.jpg)
Perkins Coie Backs Challenge to Trump's Ban on Transgender Military Service
4 minute read![German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/10/AdobeStock_627004176_Editorial_Use_Only-767x633.jpg)
German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250