Facebook Likes Jury Duty: Company Expands Pay Policy for Would-Be Jurors
Facebook Inc. employees trying to get out of jury duty can no longer use the classic "but I can't miss work" excuse.
October 20, 2017 at 03:00 PM
3 minute read
Facebook Inc. employees trying to get out of jury duty can no longer use the classic “but I can't miss work” excuse.
The social media giant announced Friday it will pay full-time employees who are called for jury duty or as witnesses at trial for an unlimited amount of service, in a Facebook post by Paul Grewal, vice president and deputy general counsel.
“I understand that jury duty isn't exactly a passion for most people, but strange as it may sound, it is for me,” wrote Grewal, who served as a U.S. magistrate judge in the Northern District of California prior to joining Facebook last year. ”By expanding our policy to cover jury service spanning more than 10 days, we are not only acknowledging the importance of juries in our society, but giving our employees the resources and encouragement to step up and serve when asked.”
In an interview in the run-up to Friday's announcement, Grewal said Facebook previously had a written policy that offered to pay for up to 10 days per year to employees who serve as jurors or witnesses. But he said the company consistently granted exemptions to the 10-day limit in the past and continued paying employees who informed the company they'd be required to serve longer. The changes announced Friday, Grewal said, make that informal rule official company policy and signal to employees—and the company's neighbors in Silicon Valley—that jury service is “a real civic obligation” that Facebook takes seriously.
“I do think that to the extent that people are reluctant to serve, one reason why is that they are worried about missing work,” Grewal said.
Grewal said that part of the impetus behind making the move official was his experience on the bench interacting with prospective jurors in the San Jose federal courthouse.
“In case after case, people who wanted to serve had to almost sheepishly volunteer that they were going to miss a paycheck” if chosen, Grewal said. Grewal said he would always grant a hardship dismissal in those cases to be fair to the individual and the parties involved in the case.
But, he said, those jurors who spoke up weren't just from mom-and-pop shops who might have trouble paying to support an absent worker. “I was surprised when people with serious jobs in serious companies would tell me that there were getting no pay for service or possibly for just a couple of days,” he said.
Grewal said he's aware of a number of companies that have unofficial policies to support prolonged jury service similar to the one Facebook had. “I'm hopeful as we are more explicit and express about this, the ones that aren't quite there yet will follow.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1The American Lawyer's Top Stories of 2024
- 2Semiconductor Component Maker Accused of Deceiving Investors About Market Downturn, Export Curbs
- 3Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
- 4Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
- 5Looming Clash Over Abortion Pills Shows Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' Settled Nothing
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250