Deutsche Bank Agrees to $220M Settlement in Case Over LIBOR Manipulation
Deutsche Bank has agreed to a $220 million, 45-state settlement over its role in the manipulation of the benchmark London Interbank Offered Rate, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's office announced Wednesday.
October 25, 2017 at 02:40 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Photo: Dantadd, via Wikimedia Commons
Deutsche Bank has agreed to a $220 million, 45-state settlement over its role in the manipulation of the benchmark London Interbank Offered Rate, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's office announced Wednesday.
“We will not tolerate fraudulent, manipulative or collusive conduct that interferes with or undermines confidence in our financial markets. Large financial institutions, like all other market participants, have to abide by the rules,” Schneiderman said in a statement.
Deutsche, along with more than a dozen other banks, helped set the interest rates for trading of the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The interest rate affects trillions of dollars worth of financial instruments.
From 2005 through the global financial crisis, investigators say they found the bank unlawfully defrauded counterparties by failing to disclose it had made false or misleading LIBOR price submissions, had traders who attempted to influence other banks' traders to benefit Deutsche's position, and was aware that submissions were being falsified by other banks as well.
According to Schneiderman, the manipulation defrauded government entities and not-for-profits of funds “that otherwise could have been used to benefit New Yorkers.” These entities entered into swaps and other financial contracts with Deutsche not knowing the interest rate on the dollar was being manipulated.
Schneiderman acknowledged that Deutsche Bank cooperated with the investigation.
A spokesman for the bank said in a statement that this resolves the bank's last U.S. regulatory inquiry related to LIBOR.
New York and California led the investigation, according to Schneiderman's office. Of the $220 million agreed to by Deutsche, more than $213 million will be made available to entities that had swap and other investments with the bank. The remainder of the settlement balance will cover investigation and other expenses.
The settlement is the second related to state prosecutors' specifically investigating LIBOR manipulation. Last year, Barclays agreed to a $100 million settlement with Schneiderman and the other 45 states that are part of the investigation working group. A number of other banks are still being investigated, according to the New York AG's office.
The settlement is also just the latest Deutsche has entered into over LIBOR accusations. In July, it agreed to pay $77 million in an antitrust suit over manipulation allegations related to the Japanese yen interest rate.
Photo: Dantadd, via Wikimedia Commons
“We will not tolerate fraudulent, manipulative or collusive conduct that interferes with or undermines confidence in our financial markets. Large financial institutions, like all other market participants, have to abide by the rules,” Schneiderman said in a statement.
Deutsche, along with more than a dozen other banks, helped set the interest rates for trading of the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The interest rate affects trillions of dollars worth of financial instruments.
From 2005 through the global financial crisis, investigators say they found the bank unlawfully defrauded counterparties by failing to disclose it had made false or misleading LIBOR price submissions, had traders who attempted to influence other banks' traders to benefit Deutsche's position, and was aware that submissions were being falsified by other banks as well.
According to Schneiderman, the manipulation defrauded government entities and not-for-profits of funds “that otherwise could have been used to benefit New Yorkers.” These entities entered into swaps and other financial contracts with Deutsche not knowing the interest rate on the dollar was being manipulated.
Schneiderman acknowledged that
A spokesman for the bank said in a statement that this resolves the bank's last U.S. regulatory inquiry related to LIBOR.
The settlement is the second related to state prosecutors' specifically investigating LIBOR manipulation. Last year,
The settlement is also just the latest Deutsche has entered into over LIBOR accusations. In July, it agreed to pay $77 million in an antitrust suit over manipulation allegations related to the Japanese yen interest rate.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Transforming Children Into ATMs'?: Roblox, Epic Games Sued for Allegedly Fueling Addictive Behavior in Minors
Amazon's Audible Hit With Privacy Class Action Over Use of Tracking Pixels
SAG-AFTRA Union Health Plan Slammed With Data Breach Class Actions in Wake of Phishing Attack
Justices to Decide if Fuel Industry Can Sue Over California’s EV Rules
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250