To Poach, or Not To Poach, That is the Question.
I want to hire a superstar lawyer I managed at my last company, but I am worried that poaching her will burn bridges with my former employer. What should I do?
October 30, 2017 at 04:40 PM
5 minute read
Julie Brush.
The Question: I want to hire a superstar lawyer I managed at my last company, but I am worried that poaching her will burn bridges with my former employer. What should I do?
Good people are very hard to find. So when you have a positive experience working with and managing a superstar lawyer, your desire to recruit that person to your new team is understandable. But when it comes to poaching a valued employee from a former employer, you must tread lightly—as you run the risk of drawing ire from your former boss and colleagues. And such a move can jeopardize relationships and taint your reputation. Two things that should be carefully preserved in this microscopic legal and business world in which we all reside.
So does this mean you should stay clear of hiring this A Player? Not necessarily. But it is important to determine whether poaching this lawyer is worth the potential relationship fallout. In order to do this, consider the following:
- Do You Have a Legal Obligation? This is cut and dry. If your employment contract or separation agreement states that you must not solicit any current employees, moving forward is a no-go.
- Strength of The Relationship With Your Former Employer. The strength and quality of these professional relationships falls on a wide spectrum. The stronger they are, the more compelling a hands off approach may be. But even if you're not peas and carrots with your former execs, the consequences of poaching a former employee can still damage your reputation and a career. It's clear from your question that there is some kind of meaningful relationship that is creating your worry about the issue. So assess this factor carefully.
- How Critical is This Lawyer To Your Former Employer. A key lawyer's departure will have a material impact on the legal department … and organization. And the more critical s/he is, the more ire you may create.
- How Powerful are Your Former Colleagues. Are they Goliaths in the legal and/or business world? Are they uber connected and influential? Are they willing to wield that influence to take you down or taint your reputation? Measure their power and pick your battles.
- Your Former Employer's Reaction To Your Poaching. No one is happy when you take their “people”, but reactions vary. So assess his/her personality type, the anticipated reaction and the likelihood the former exec will retaliate.
- Your Needs and Duty To Your Current Employer. It's also important to take into account your own needs and the duty to your current employer to build the best legal team possible to protect the company. How important is this hire to fulfilling these needs? Are there plenty fish in the sea or is this person a must-have?
- Did S/he Contact You? This may make a difference … or it may not depending on the circumstances. But if your former colleague has reached out to you directly, it likely indicates that s/he is loose in the saddle and will leave for greener pastures regardless of your decision to engage. This circumstance can make it easier if you're required to explain your actions—as the decision was prompted by them as opposed to you.
After assessing the above, you may determine that it's too risky a path to take – and elect to pursue alternative measures like conducting a search and considering other candidates. If this lawyer has approached you and you elect not to engage, be honest about the challenges facing his/her candidacy and move on. But if you elect to press forward…and your recruiting efforts succeed in landing your superstar, I recommend that you extend your former colleagues the professional courtesy of a phone call (email is a distant second) to notify them of the situation, address any issues and create closure. This will maximize your ability to preserve your relationships and mitigate bad feelings. Might it be uncomfortable? Yes. Might it be hard? Yep. Might there be conflict? Uh huh. Regardless, being direct and open is the professional … and right thing to do. And you'll feel better about yourself for doing so. If you have anxiety, prepare for your call and any questions, complaints or barbs that might come your way and you'll feel more confident going into the conversation.
It's a dog eat dog world out there—and competition for the best talent remains stiff. So picking off your former superstar employee is an easy way to build your world-class team. It's a tempting proposition, no doubt. But before you act, pause … and consider the issues that should influence your decision and your conduct in the process. By doing so thoughtfully, you will determine for yourself whether tis nobler to poach … or not.
Julie Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250