Expert Opinion

To Poach, or Not To Poach, That is the Question.

I want to hire a superstar lawyer I managed at my last company, but I am worried that poaching her will burn bridges with my former employer. What should I do?

October 30, 2017 at 04:40 PM

5 minute read


Julie Brush Julie Brush.

The Question: I want to hire a superstar lawyer I managed at my last company, but I am worried that poaching her will burn bridges with my former employer. What should I do?

Good people are very hard to find. So when you have a positive experience working with and managing a superstar lawyer, your desire to recruit that person to your new team is understandable. But when it comes to poaching a valued employee from a former employer, you must tread lightly—as you run the risk of drawing ire from your former boss and colleagues. And such a move can jeopardize relationships and taint your reputation. Two things that should be carefully preserved in this microscopic legal and business world in which we all reside.

So does this mean you should stay clear of hiring this A Player? Not necessarily. But it is important to determine whether poaching this lawyer is worth the potential relationship fallout. In order to do this, consider the following:

  • Do You Have a Legal Obligation? This is cut and dry. If your employment contract or separation agreement states that you must not solicit any current employees, moving forward is a no-go.
  • Strength of The Relationship With Your Former Employer. The strength and quality of these professional relationships falls on a wide spectrum. The stronger they are, the more compelling a hands off approach may be. But even if you're not peas and carrots with your former execs, the consequences of poaching a former employee can still damage your reputation and a career. It's clear from your question that there is some kind of meaningful relationship that is creating your worry about the issue. So assess this factor carefully.
  • How Critical is This Lawyer To Your Former Employer. A key lawyer's departure will have a material impact on the legal department … and organization. And the more critical s/he is, the more ire you may create.
  • How Powerful are Your Former Colleagues. Are they Goliaths in the legal and/or business world? Are they uber connected and influential? Are they willing to wield that influence to take you down or taint your reputation? Measure their power and pick your battles.
  • Your Former Employer's Reaction To Your Poaching. No one is happy when you take their “people”, but reactions vary. So assess his/her personality type, the anticipated reaction and the likelihood the former exec will retaliate.
  • Your Needs and Duty To Your Current Employer. It's also important to take into account your own needs and the duty to your current employer to build the best legal team possible to protect the company. How important is this hire to fulfilling these needs? Are there plenty fish in the sea or is this person a must-have?
  • Did S/he Contact You? This may make a difference … or it may not depending on the circumstances. But if your former colleague has reached out to you directly, it likely indicates that s/he is loose in the saddle and will leave for greener pastures regardless of your decision to engage. This circumstance can make it easier if you're required to explain your actions—as the decision was prompted by them as opposed to you.

After assessing the above, you may determine that it's too risky a path to take – and elect to pursue alternative measures like conducting a search and considering other candidates. If this lawyer has approached you and you elect not to engage, be honest about the challenges facing his/her candidacy and move on. But if you elect to press forward…and your recruiting efforts succeed in landing your superstar, I recommend that you extend your former colleagues the professional courtesy of a phone call (email is a distant second) to notify them of the situation, address any issues and create closure. This will maximize your ability to preserve your relationships and mitigate bad feelings. Might it be uncomfortable? Yes. Might it be hard? Yep. Might there be conflict? Uh huh. Regardless, being direct and open is the professional … and right thing to do. And you'll feel better about yourself for doing so. If you have anxiety, prepare for your call and any questions, complaints or barbs that might come your way and you'll feel more confident going into the conversation.

It's a dog eat dog world out there—and competition for the best talent remains stiff. So picking off your former superstar employee is an easy way to build your world-class team. It's a tempting proposition, no doubt. But before you act, pause … and consider the issues that should influence your decision and your conduct in the process. By doing so thoughtfully, you will determine for yourself whether tis nobler to poach … or not.

Julie Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT

Latest
Trending

Who Got The Work

J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Read More

Law.com Pro

    More from ALM