Wilson Sonsini Announces Leadership Shakeup
Corporate partner Katharine “Katie” Martin has taken over as chair of the firm's board in a move that will also keep longtime leader Larry Sonsini in an active role as senior and founding partner.
October 31, 2017 at 06:10 PM
4 minute read
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati announced Tuesday that corporate partner Katharine “Katie” Martin would take over as chair of the firm's board in a leadership change that will also keep longtime leader Larry Sonsini in an active role as senior and founding partner.
Martin, who works out of Palo Alto, will step into leadership immediately after the firm said she was elected to head Wilson Sonsini's 10-member board, which serves as its governing body. Going forward, Wilson Sonsini will no longer have a “firm chairman”—the position that Sonsini long held—as that role has been replaced with a new leadership structure that puts Martin as chair of a governing board that will set the firm's strategic direction in close collaboration with the firm's managing partner, Douglas Clark, and practice leaders.
In a statement, Sonsini described Martin as a “dear friend” and the “ideal partner” to step into leadership. Martin joined Wilson Sonsini in 1999 from what is now known as Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. During her time at the firm, she has counted as clients well-known technology companies such as LinkedIn Corp., Sun Microsystems Inc. and Twitter Inc. Among various other matters, Martin served in a lead role on the Wilson Sonsini team that advised LinkedIn last year on its $26.2 billion sale to Microsoft Corp.
“Katie is one of the most accomplished advisers in the technology industry,” said Sonsini, who spent more than 35 years as chairman at Wilson Sonsini. “We have worked closely together for nearly 20 years and I, and the rest of the partnership, greatly value her judgment, character and leadership. As we continue to build our management team for the future, I have no doubt that Katie's board leadership will help the firm continue to advance in all respects.”
Martin said in an interview Tuesday that she intends to bring a collaborative approach to the leadership role, and to carry on a tradition set by Sonsini, who maintained an active practice in addition to his firm leadership responsibilities. Martin also said she plans to continue advising clients and is looking forward to mentorship from Sonsini after his long-tenured stewardship of the firm.
“This is a great growth opportunity for me personally … for me to really now be in a position to be mentored by Larry in this significant leadership role,” Martin said.
The firm's leadership change comes after a spate of recent partner departures from Wilson Sonsini, including Larry Sonsini's son, Matthew Sonsini, who returned to the firm last year before leaving for a second time in early September to pursue other endeavors. Michael Rubin, co-chair of Wilson Sonsini's privacy and data protection practice, recently joined Latham & Watkins in San Francisco, while former CFO Sunil Bhardwaj left Wilson Sonsini in January.
Larry Sonsini.
In an interview Tuesday, however, Larry Sonsini said that his firm's new leadership structure had nothing to do with partner hirings or departures, which he said are part of “the nature of the legal industry today.”
Instead, he said, the firm recognized that a leadership model based on a single chairman didn't make as much sense anymore, given Wilson Sonsini's recent growth, along with changes in the legal industry and the demands of clients. And those changes, Sonsini said, are likely to continue. Wilson Sonsini expects to cross the $1 billion annual gross revenue mark within the next five years and could grow to 1,000 lawyers over that period, up from the roughly 800 lawyers it has now.
Sonsini also stressed that the leadership change shouldn't be viewed as a sign that he's going anywhere.
“This is going to really free me up to focus on our brand and our revenue and our global reach, and at the same time put me in a position to be an adviser to Katie,” Sonsini said. “This is not me stepping back from the practice; this is not me taking more time to play golf. What we're talking about is re-positioning.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
5 minute readCourt rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250