Four Takeaways From California's New Report on Banking and Marijuana
After a year of meetings and hearings, California's working group on marijuana and banking issued its final report Tuesday. It's overarching conclusion? California can only do so much to entice banks and credit unions to open accounts for marijuana-related businesses.
November 07, 2017 at 06:13 PM
5 minute read
After a year of meetings and hearings, California's working group on marijuana and banking issued its final report Tuesday. It's overarching conclusion? California can only do so much to entice banks and credit unions to open accounts for marijuana-related businesses.
“A definitive bulletproof solution will remain elusive until the federal government removes cannabis from its official list of banned drugs or Congress approves safe harbor legislation protecting banks that serve cannabis businesses from prosecution,” Treasurer John Chiang told reporters gathered at the state Capitol.
The report does recommend several approaches for the state as it barrels toward a legalized recreational market on Jan. 1—and plans for how to move the anticipated $7 billion in sales out of cash tills and into financial institutions.
Here are four takeaways from the report.
California won't soon open a state bank for cannabis.
When Chiang first launched the working group, he didn't offer much support for the idea of a public bank that could serve marijuana retailers shut out of traditional institutions. The final report doesn't endorse the notion either, recommending instead that the treasurer and attorney general conduct a “feasibility study.”
“We will do the research to see what legal, what regulatory, what financial obligations, what unresolved issues need to be answered so that we can go forward,” Chiang told reporters Tuesday.
John ChiangThe treasurer didn't put a timeline on completing the study—his term ends next year—or limit what types of banking institutions it would consider.
“We're not wedded to one form,” he said. “What we're concerned about is what the substance is and who's going to engage to make sure we can create a more enhanced and fully operational banking system in the state of California.”
There are plenty of obstacles to a public bank—including the need for a master account from the Federal Reserve, insurance and possible opposition from the banking industry.
“We don't understand how this bank would be treated any differently from any state or federally chartered bank” that is attempting to serve marijuana-related business clients, said Beth Mills, senior vice president of the California Banking Association.
Alameda County and several Bay Area cities are conducting their own public bank feasibility study.
Armored services could see a big boost in business.
Chiang wants armed contractors to pick up tax and licensing payments from unbanked, cash-heavy marijuana businesses and deliver them to secure counting facilities. The payments would then move to either a bank that accepts marijuana receipts or to a Federal Reserve site.
“Such an arrangement would address a number of barriers to the collection of tax and fee payments, and result in increased safety, would not require banks to engage in activities that expose them to greater risk than they are willing to take, and increase taxpayer compliance,” Chiang wrote in his recommendations.
The treasurer said his office has already been contacted by interested couriers. But some transport services have shied away from moving marijuana cash because of the drug's illegality at the federal level.
Is transparency the answer?
Chiang wants the state and local agencies to create a single portal aggregating data on cannabis businesses, including names of key personnel, product lists, sources of supply, financial records and citations for violations.
The idea, he said, is to offer hesitant banks enough information on growers and retailers so that they feel confident any accounts they open for marijuana-related businesses will be compliant with federal guidelines.
“Based on these guidelines, a handful of financial institutions are serving the cannabis industry in other states and it is probable some will do so in California as well,” Chiang said.
California will become a lobbyist.
The solution to opening bank doors to marijuana businesses will be found at the federal level, Chiang said. The treasurer is proposing a consortium of marijuana-legal states to advocate for changes in federal laws. A top goal would be the creation of a legal safe harbor for banks that serve cannabis customers in compliance with state laws.
Chang said five marijuana-legal states and associations representing bankers and the marijuana industry are on board.
The state treasurer's cannabis banking report is posted below.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
5 minute readCourt rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250