2017 Legal Departments of the Year, Legal Operations, Large Companies: NetApp
The mantra "work differently" has led the way to success for NetApp's legal department.
November 13, 2017 at 06:30 AM
5 minute read
Connie Brenton of NetApp. Photo by Timothy Archibald.
This past year, the legal team at NetApp Inc., found itself tackling a challenge that in-house lawyers at many companies must grapple with —a growing number of legal matters to manage, without a corresponding increase in budget or headcount. But few have approached the problem with such aplomb or had as much success in solving it.
According to Connie Brenton, NetApp's chief of staff and senior director of legal operations at the Sunnyvale-based company, a transformation was in order.
“We needed a mindset shift in how we fundamentally work,” Brenton said in an email interview. “We took a deep dive into what we were going to stop doing, what we were going to outsource and what we would keep in-house. We fundamentally changed the way we 'right sourced' work.”
Brenton and the NetApp legal team of 38 attorneys worldwide were instructed by GC Matthew Fawcett not to “do more with less” but instead to “work differently.”
And they did. Their efforts included working with NetApp's outside legal services provider and contract services group to create a Global Legal Shared Services team. “This team has created a self-service process, leveraging technology, offshoring work where possible and understanding when to support the work with in-house counsel,” said Brenton.
To get a new shared services organization in gear, NetApp had to identify lower-level and more routine work, with the input of in-house lawyers who have helped define global processes that would get this work done efficiently. NetApp also put together metrics and goals for each process, so the shared services team can evaluate performance.
This has resulted in right sourced work and a limited number of escalations up to in-house legal team. And new efficiencies have been achieved, with time spent on one type of agreement that was shifted to the shared services team model down by 85 percent.
This past year, NetApp grew its legal dashboard, which had originally been designed to look at legal spend data, to include sections on Operations, Contract Services, Continuing Education and Compliance. NetApp's legal leadership can view metrics in real time around their team's performance in these areas.
NetApp's overall focus on metrics and data has allowed the in-house lawyers to excel in finding and negotiating alternative fee arrangements for outside legal work this year. As a result, 68 percent of the company's outside legal spend is now done on a fixed fee basis.
“NetApp understands our data — we have experience with data collection, cleansing and analysis,” Brenton said. “We know how much legal matters should cost, allowing migration to fixed fees versus hourly rates to be natural and seamless.”
Connie Brenton of NetApp. Photo by Timothy Archibald.
This past year, the legal team at NetApp Inc., found itself tackling a challenge that in-house lawyers at many companies must grapple with —a growing number of legal matters to manage, without a corresponding increase in budget or headcount. But few have approached the problem with such aplomb or had as much success in solving it.
According to Connie Brenton, NetApp's chief of staff and senior director of legal operations at the Sunnyvale-based company, a transformation was in order.
“We needed a mindset shift in how we fundamentally work,” Brenton said in an email interview. “We took a deep dive into what we were going to stop doing, what we were going to outsource and what we would keep in-house. We fundamentally changed the way we 'right sourced' work.”
Brenton and the NetApp legal team of 38 attorneys worldwide were instructed by GC Matthew Fawcett not to “do more with less” but instead to “work differently.”
And they did. Their efforts included working with NetApp's outside legal services provider and contract services group to create a Global Legal Shared Services team. “This team has created a self-service process, leveraging technology, offshoring work where possible and understanding when to support the work with in-house counsel,” said Brenton.
To get a new shared services organization in gear, NetApp had to identify lower-level and more routine work, with the input of in-house lawyers who have helped define global processes that would get this work done efficiently. NetApp also put together metrics and goals for each process, so the shared services team can evaluate performance.
This has resulted in right sourced work and a limited number of escalations up to in-house legal team. And new efficiencies have been achieved, with time spent on one type of agreement that was shifted to the shared services team model down by 85 percent.
This past year, NetApp grew its legal dashboard, which had originally been designed to look at legal spend data, to include sections on Operations, Contract Services, Continuing Education and Compliance. NetApp's legal leadership can view metrics in real time around their team's performance in these areas.
NetApp's overall focus on metrics and data has allowed the in-house lawyers to excel in finding and negotiating alternative fee arrangements for outside legal work this year. As a result, 68 percent of the company's outside legal spend is now done on a fixed fee basis.
“NetApp understands our data — we have experience with data collection, cleansing and analysis,” Brenton said. “We know how much legal matters should cost, allowing migration to fixed fees versus hourly rates to be natural and seamless.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney of the Year Finalist: Michael Rubin, Latham & Watkins
Attorney of the Year Winner: Kalpana Srinivasan, Susman Godfrey
Cooley Litigation Rainmaker Mike Rhodes Set to Retire: 'It's a Good Time to Hang It Up and Do Something Else'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250