Google Faces New State AG Investigation Over Business Practices
Missouri's attorney general on Monday launched an investigation into Google Inc., questioning whether the search engine company's data-collection and privacy practices violate state consumer protection laws.
November 13, 2017 at 06:21 PM
4 minute read
Missouri's attorney general on Monday launched an investigation into Google Inc., questioning whether the search engine company's data-collection and privacy practices violate state consumer protection laws.
Josh Hawley, a Republican running for U.S. Senate, issued an eight-page civil investigative demand to the Mountain View-based company seeking records about privacy policies, data-sharing practices with third parties, database protection efforts and more.
“There is strong reason to believe that Google has not been acting with the best interest of Missourians in mind,” Hawley said in a statement. “My office will not stand by and let private consumer information be jeopardized by industry giants, especially to pad their profits.”
Google did not respond to a request for comment. Google spokesman Patrick Lenihan told The Kansas City Star that the company has “strong privacy protections in place for our users and continue[s] to operate in a highly competitive and dynamic environment.” Google has not yet received the subpoena, Lenihan said.
Hawley's demand for records comes as federal agencies scrutinize Google and other tech companies over their roles in Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 election and over their roles as virtual platforms for online sex trafficking. In June, the European Union fined Google $2.7 billion for violating antitrust law by manipulating search results to favor its own Google Shopping site. Google has appealed.
Consumer groups have complained to federal regulators that Google changed its privacy policies to allow it to collect more information about users across its affiliated apps and sites. “When a company has access to as much consumer information as Google does, it's my duty to ensure they are using it appropriately,” Hawley said.
Google's practices have also been targeted by states. In 2013, the company reached a $17 million settlement with 37 states and the District of Columbia over claims it circumvented Apple Safari's setting to install third-party cookies.
Hawley said his office will also investigate allegations that Google misappropriated content from its competitors. Online reviews portal Yelp in September complained that Google was scraping photographs and other data from its site and others' in violation of a 2012 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission.
Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood also served Google with an investigatory subpoena in 2014 for information about online pharmaceutical sales, human trafficking and copyright infringement. After two years of litigation—Google alleged that Hood's actions were politically motivated—Hood withdrew his subpoena and Google dropped its lawsuit.
The Missouri attorney general's civil investigative demand is posted below.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Tech Startups That Google-backed Venture Firms Invested in Throughout 2024
OpenAI Hires First Compliance Chief, Snagging Uber's Scott Schools
Faegre Drinker Picks Arizona for Next-Gen Design Lab
Trending Stories
- 1Georgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
- 2Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
- 3Slideshow: Jewish Bar Association of Georgia Marks 1st Year With Hanukkah Party
- 4Holland & Knight Launches Export Control Disputes and Advocacy Team
- 5Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250