Legal Departments of the Year, In-House Impact Award: Keith Askoff, Varian Medical Systems
Keith Askoff, vice president and associate general counsel for IP at Varian Medical Systems has had a busy few years.
November 13, 2017 at 09:30 AM
11 minute read
Looking back, Keith Askoff, vice president and associate general counsel for intellectual property at Varian Medical Systems Inc., said he's not sure how he survived the last couple of years.
In addition to continuing to oversee his company's IP procurement and to provide legal counsel to its executives, Askoff was put in charge of the IP aspect of a Board-approved spinoff of Varian's components business. As if that weren't enough, though, he also managed infringement litigation that spanned about half a dozen jurisdictions, in the U.S. and abroad, and culminated with a walkaway settlement in the two-year patent battle initiated by Varian's rival Elekta (litigation that landed Varian another award from The Recorder this year).
At the heart of the Elekta litigation was a high-stakes case before the International Trade Commission involving Varian patents in radiotherapy systems that are used in about 60 to 70 percent of all cancer treatments, Askoff said. He worked closely with litigators at Cooley, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Beck, Bismonte & Finley to help land a pivotal victory—an administrative law judge's finding that certain radiotherapy Elekta devices infringed on three patents owned by Varian.
And when litigation revolves around technologies with names like Multi-Mode Cone Beam CT Radiotherapy Simulator and Treatment Machine With a Flat Panel Imager, even Askoff acknowledges that there's an added degree of difficulty associated with the proceedings.
“You can't change the law, and you can't change the facts, but you do have to figure out how to make it understandable,” Askoff said, adding that the expert witnesses the company called did an excellent job explaining the technicalities of the inventions. “That's where lawyers' roles really come in.”
“We did a good job strategizing and presenting, but our innovations are phenomenal. The heft of these inventions is what carried the day,” he added.
Beyond reviewing materials and examining strategy and direction, Askoff said a lot of his responsibilities involved logistical matters such as choosing witnesses and preparing them for trial testimony.
“There was a whole organizational aspect of the litigation that was very extensive,” he said.
In discussing his relationship with his outside lawyers, Askoff described frequent meetings, very cooperative strategizing and an open dialogue.
“I definitely want to hear the firm's advice because when you're in-house, you can become emotionally invested in these things,” he said. “What's great about developing a relationship with outside counsel is that if I feel really strongly about something, they're comfortable pressing their point or pushing back on me.
“If you take too much of the view of, 'Hey, I'm the client, I'm in charge,' you're not taking advantage of your outside counsel. If, at the end of the day, I can't convince them, I go with their advice—that's why I hired them,” he explained.
Keith Askoff, Varian Medical. Handout photo.Looking back, Keith Askoff, vice president and associate general counsel for intellectual property at
In addition to continuing to oversee his company's IP procurement and to provide legal counsel to its executives, Askoff was put in charge of the IP aspect of a Board-approved spinoff of Varian's components business. As if that weren't enough, though, he also managed infringement litigation that spanned about half a dozen jurisdictions, in the U.S. and abroad, and culminated with a walkaway settlement in the two-year patent battle initiated by Varian's rival Elekta (litigation that landed Varian another award from The Recorder this year).
At the heart of the Elekta litigation was a high-stakes case before the International Trade Commission involving Varian patents in radiotherapy systems that are used in about 60 to 70 percent of all cancer treatments, Askoff said. He worked closely with litigators at
And when litigation revolves around technologies with names like Multi-Mode Cone Beam CT Radiotherapy Simulator and Treatment Machine With a Flat Panel Imager, even Askoff acknowledges that there's an added degree of difficulty associated with the proceedings.
“You can't change the law, and you can't change the facts, but you do have to figure out how to make it understandable,” Askoff said, adding that the expert witnesses the company called did an excellent job explaining the technicalities of the inventions. “That's where lawyers' roles really come in.”
“We did a good job strategizing and presenting, but our innovations are phenomenal. The heft of these inventions is what carried the day,” he added.
Beyond reviewing materials and examining strategy and direction, Askoff said a lot of his responsibilities involved logistical matters such as choosing witnesses and preparing them for trial testimony.
“There was a whole organizational aspect of the litigation that was very extensive,” he said.
In discussing his relationship with his outside lawyers, Askoff described frequent meetings, very cooperative strategizing and an open dialogue.
“I definitely want to hear the firm's advice because when you're in-house, you can become emotionally invested in these things,” he said. “What's great about developing a relationship with outside counsel is that if I feel really strongly about something, they're comfortable pressing their point or pushing back on me.
“If you take too much of the view of, 'Hey, I'm the client, I'm in charge,' you're not taking advantage of your outside counsel. If, at the end of the day, I can't convince them, I go with their advice—that's why I hired them,” he explained.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors Amid the Tragedy of the LA Fires
Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
Ben Brafman Reflects on Nearly 50 Years as a Defense Attorney
Like a Life Raft: Ben Brafman Reflects on Nearly 50 Years as a Defense Attorney
Trending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250