Legal Departments of the Year, Legal Operations, Emerging Companies: Lyft
Frances Pomposo is a legal ops team of one for Lyft.
November 13, 2017 at 06:15 AM
3 minute read
Lyft Inc. added its first legal operations professional less than a year ago. Since then, this legal ops team of one has overhauled the company's contract management process, improved efficiencies for the legal department and has made Lyft's in-house attorneys more accessible to the rest of the company.
Frances Pomposo became head of legal ops at Lyft in December 2016 after more than six years at Adobe Systems Inc. She said as Lyft's first ops hire, her job is “basically starting from ground zero” by establishing the function and educating people on what it is.
Pomposo has built legal ops up quickly. She has, for one, tackled the company's approach to contracts with the implementation of a new contract management system in September of this year. This process has created a number of efficiencies for Lyft's in-house attorneys, from providing a clear look at contracts across the company to offering the ability to create instant nondisclosure agreements.
“From an organization perspective, it's given us the ability to have one place where all our contracts live, and not just depend on business partners to send them to us after they're executed or hunt them down after the process is over,” Pomposo said. “So that means, if we ever have to do a search, or basically understand what we've agreed to … we're able to do that and guarantee that all our contracts are there.”
And with the new approach to NDAs, a lot of the back-and-forth correspondence that used to take place has been eliminated, according to Pomposo. It used to be that a business partner would reach out to the legal department asking for an NDA when it wanted to engage with a company or an individual, she explained. And then, she said, legal would fill it out, send it to the business partner, and changes might be made and “maybe eventually, it would trickle back to legal, but you never know.”
Now, Pomposo said, there's an e-form that can be filled out by the person who needs it; if no changes are necessary, it can be sent instantly to the business partner or external party and is automatically filed in the contract management system.
In her short tenure with the company, Pomposo has also improved the legal department's accessibility on the company's intranet. Where the legal department previously didn't really have a presence, on Lyft's internal pages, a company-facing legal site, launched in March, features information about each of the teams within legal and provides guidance materials and contact information for the attorneys so employees know who to contact for specific matters.
Looking ahead, Pomposo said the biggest initiative for Lyft legal ops is ensuring that legal scales with the company and that its accessible enough so “people know how to get the services they need” from the department.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllScammers Target Lawyers Across Country With Fake Court Notices
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Trending Stories
- 1Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 2Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 3Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 4Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 5SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250