Corporate Departments of the Year, Emerging Companies: Cooley
Cooley repped C3 IoT on its Series E financing, Quanergy Systems Inc. on its Series B, and Intarcia Therapeutics Inc. in its Series EE closings.
November 15, 2017 at 06:05 PM
4 minute read
Unicorns? Cooley represents plenty of them. This past year Cooley represented software company C3 IoT on its Series E financing, raised at a $1.4 billion valuation; Quanergy Systems Inc. on its $90 million Series B, which valued the company at more than $1 billion; and Intarcia Therapeutics Inc. in its Series EE closings at a $3.5 billion valuation. Cooley's Matthew Bartus and Patrick Mitchell, co-chairs of the firm's emerging companies practice, responded to The Recorder's question about what keeps a stream of up-and-coming Silicon Valley companies turning to the firm.
What do each of these engagements you're being recognized for demonstrate about Cooley's ability to work with emerging companies? We've worked with each company—C3 IoT, Quanergy Systems and Intarcia Therapeutics—from the beginning. Cooley's ability to scale strong cross-practice teams to mirror company growth provides a great asset as we help companies navigate industry hurdles. Each client has unique needs, and we adapt our cross-practice teams to best assist in their journey.
What would you say are the traits of deal lawyers and the department overall that keep emerging company clients coming back to Cooley? How do you keep yourself start-up friendly as the firm grows nationally and internationally? The emerging companies ecosystem is the backbone of Cooley. In 1958, we formed the first VC limited partnership in the western United States—Draper, Gaither and Anderson—so it has been an essential part of our identity for generations, and we are extremely connected to the pulse of the community. In addition to our networking, we place a lot of our focus on tech-enabled services, such as Cooley GO, our free online resource platform and document generator for entrepreneurs and investors at tech companies at all stages of the growth cycle.
A prospective emerging company client with an urgent matter calls and asks why your team should be retained to handle it. What is your answer? We know the space better than any other firm, and we are the best equipped to handle the issues that arise as companies scale. An early-stage company might not need, say, a securities litigation person now, but we can easily integrate such specialists as needs change. A unique part of Cooley's platform is that there are no origination credits, which helps to break down barriers in terms of access to the top lawyers in different practices.
What is the firm doing to train the next generation of emerging company lawyers in its ranks? Cooley is focused on next generation leadership. Senior associates are highly involved in matters, which saves money, increases efficiency and allows them the opportunity to further their own professional development. The firm also places a lot of emphasis on increasing diversity in law – both to build a workforce that is more diverse in opinions and perspectives, and so our ranks better match those of the groundbreaking companies we represent.
How do you balance the need to cross every “T” and dot every “I” in a particular deal with demands to be efficient with client resources? Our client base demands efficiency. Based on our long experience in the emerging companies ecosystem, we know precisely when to go fast and when to go slow. Regardless of the situation, our commitment to excellence and accuracy does not waiver. Cooley GO also provides a breadth of free legal and business content to assist the tech community, and it is regularly updated with new topics, content and features.
How are your emerging company teams using technology to work more efficiently? We don't waste time reinventing the wheel. For example, in early September, we released a new incorporation package for Delaware public benefit corporations on Cooley GO. And in June we released a package of customizable Series Seed Note and Series Seed Equity documents on both Cooley GO and under open source license on GitHub. Setting up this kind of tech-enabled document generation allows both our internal teams to be more efficient and also helps entrepreneurs overcome financial barriers and more quickly get their ideas to the marketplace. We also have a dedicated practice innovation team who are tasked with expanding our technology services, including on Cooley GO, and generally finding new ways to enable success at all levels of company growth.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow the Deal Got Done: Sidley Austin and NWSL Angel City Football Club/Iger
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
19 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250