Corporate Departments of the Year, Venture Capital: Cooley
Cooley represented Venrock, Upfront Ventures and Menlo Ventures in fund closings—all drawing $400 to $450 million apiece
November 15, 2017 at 05:45 PM
4 minute read
After 50-plus years in the business, Cooley's venture capital team just keeps trucking.
This past year Cooley represented Venrock, Upfront Ventures and Menlo Ventures in fund closings—all drawing $400 million to $450 million apiece. Craig Dauchy, the head of Cooley's venture capital practice group and a member of the management committee, recently shared a bit about the firm's approach to the market with The Recorder—notably that brevity is a virtue in the VC world.
What do each of these engagements the firm is being recognized for demonstrate about Cooley's VC capacities? Cooley understands the marketplace for institutionally-backed top-performing firms like these. We bring this knowledge to all our engagements. One of our strengths is the diversity of the venture capital firms we represent—across sectors, industries and stages. The VCs themselves range from well-established players who turn to us for multiple funds over many years to market newcomers, forming everything from microcaps to funds that raise more than a billion dollars.
What would you say are the traits of deal lawyers and the department overall that keep venture capital clients coming back to Cooley? Our firm is purpose-built around venture capital and the companies in which VCs invest. We're known for being light, fast and flexible. Our lawyers are business-minded and user-friendly, as evidenced by our fund agreements, which average 50% shorter than our competitors. Our efficiency allows us to focus on what matters most—providing unparalleled client service.
A prospective VC client with an urgent matter calls and asks why your team should be retained to handle it. What's your answer? We have been active in the VC industry for more than 50 years. We helped to build its very architecture, having formed the first VC limited partnership in the western U.S. Today we are the leading firm in the world representing VC clients.
Given this deep history and prevalence of our practice in the space, our understanding of the market is unmatched. We know the limited partners, the terms they want, the terms GPs should obtain given their leverage—and we know how to bridge that gap. We also specialize in related areas to support investors and the companies they invest in, including VC financings, IPOs and capital markets, M&A, intellectual property, taxation, employment and litigation.
What is the firm doing to train up the next generation of VC lawyers in its ranks? Training starts even before law school grads join the firm permanently. We host a “boot camp” for our summer associate class focused on venture capital. Training continues through the ranks. Associates enjoy professional development programs, including Cooley College and our mid-level associate academy. In addition, the VC group hosts monthly meetings to keep updated on the state of the market and current trends. The group also holds monthly associate-focused training sessions developing skills and knowledge in the various aspects of representing VC clients. Professional growth is also intertwined with Cooley's place in the VC community. We are constantly participating in events, conferences, panel discussions and more, all offering further opportunities to learn, network and sharpen skills.
How do you balance the need to cross every “T” and dot every “I” in a particular deal with demands to be efficient with client resources? In our opinion, efficiency and accuracy are not mutually exclusive. For us, both are a necessity. We have to be efficient because that's what our clients expect, and we have to be accurate because that is our standard. We consistently offer top-notch, efficient work—we would not have developed our reputation in this industry otherwise.
How are your VC lawyers using technology to work more efficiently? In addition to providing powerful public resources such as Cooley GO, we use technology to maximize collaboration and securely share information both internally and with our clients. We use document generators to create initial drafts of common forms to increase efficiency and provide greater value for our clients. Also on Cooley GO, we track agreement terms, allowing a deep analysis of market trends. We are constantly looking for better ways to leverage technology—as the market evolves, so do we.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow the Deal Got Done: Sidley Austin and NWSL Angel City Football Club/Iger
How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
19 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250