In-House Impact Award: Todd Hamblet, Uber
Hamblet helped the ride-sharing company ink a joint venture with Yandex creating a ride-hailing business targeting Russia and the surrounding region in a deal valued at a $3.4 billion.
November 15, 2017 at 06:30 PM
9 minute read
Todd Hamblet, the associate general counsel, Global Corporate and M&A at Uber Technologies Inc., helped the ride-sharing company wrap up perhaps its most ambitious international venture to date.
Hamblet oversaw a team from Cooley that formulated Uber's joint venture with Yandex, the so-called “Google of Russia,” which created a ride-hailing business targeting Russia and the surrounding region in a venture pegged at a $3.4 billion value. Hamblet recently shared a bit about the deal with The Recorder and why it was a priority for Uber.
How did this deal get from term sheet to signed in two months? And why was it an important deal for Uber? I have a simple motto on my team—”execute, execute, execute.” So the short answer is that my team helped achieve an exceptional outcome through execution. More specifically, we brought subject matter expertise, issue spotting, project management, and focus on the key issues to expedite signing.
As a global company, we continually evaluate transactions to build a sustainable global business while optimizing the service for riders and drivers.
How big was the team internally that was working on this on the legal side, and how many folks at Cooley did you have working on it? How did it compare size-wise to other Uber deal teams you've been a part of? I am a firm believer in the power of teamwork. There were numerous colleagues and subject matter experts across the legal team, the corporate development team, and other Uber teams that contributed to the success of negotiating and managing this deal from term sheet to signing. That said, the core members of the corporate legal team that led on this deal were Christian Lymn and Andrew Glickman. Other contributors are too numerous to name but their contributions were (and continue to be) invaluable.
I have a similar response regarding the Cooley team. They drew on internal subject matter expertise across a wide range of issues to advise on the deal, but our team was led by Jamie Leigh and Ben Berle.
So, I gather this was a highly technical deal with very little precedent. Structurally, what stands out about it? I am reluctant to share too much of the “secret sauce,” but this was a highly technical deal, and joint ventures are notoriously difficult to negotiate. We also had to manage key issues, such as intellectual property and personnel matters, governance and compliance, and a complicated regulatory landscape.
I see your title is now AGC, Global Corporate and M&A. Is that new since this deal was signed? Yes, I was promoted during our mid-year performance review cycle. I believe there were many factors, including this transaction, that led to the promotion.
What exactly does the role entail? My team and I are responsible for global corporate matters, including M&A. Our mandate includes typical matters, such as all of our fundraising activity (equity and debt), credit facilities, M&A, board and shareholder matters and general corporate governance and maintenance matters. We also coordinate with other G&A functions such as accounting, tax and stock, and we work closely with our compensation/benefits and HR teams (among others).
Todd Hamblet, the associate general counsel, Global Corporate and M&A at Uber Technologies Inc., helped the ride-sharing company wrap up perhaps its most ambitious international venture to date.
Hamblet oversaw a team from
How did this deal get from term sheet to signed in two months? And why was it an important deal for Uber? I have a simple motto on my team—”execute, execute, execute.” So the short answer is that my team helped achieve an exceptional outcome through execution. More specifically, we brought subject matter expertise, issue spotting, project management, and focus on the key issues to expedite signing.
As a global company, we continually evaluate transactions to build a sustainable global business while optimizing the service for riders and drivers.
How big was the team internally that was working on this on the legal side, and how many folks at
I have a similar response regarding the
So, I gather this was a highly technical deal with very little precedent. Structurally, what stands out about it? I am reluctant to share too much of the “secret sauce,” but this was a highly technical deal, and joint ventures are notoriously difficult to negotiate. We also had to manage key issues, such as intellectual property and personnel matters, governance and compliance, and a complicated regulatory landscape.
I see your title is now AGC, Global Corporate and M&A. Is that new since this deal was signed? Yes, I was promoted during our mid-year performance review cycle. I believe there were many factors, including this transaction, that led to the promotion.
What exactly does the role entail? My team and I are responsible for global corporate matters, including M&A. Our mandate includes typical matters, such as all of our fundraising activity (equity and debt), credit facilities, M&A, board and shareholder matters and general corporate governance and maintenance matters. We also coordinate with other G&A functions such as accounting, tax and stock, and we work closely with our compensation/benefits and HR teams (among others).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250