In-House Impact: Seth Weissman, SolarCity
When Seth Weissman arrived at SolarCity in 2008, he was employee number 250 and the company's first full-time lawyer. By the time he left his post…
November 15, 2017 at 06:33 PM
10 minute read
When Seth Weissman arrived at SolarCity in 2008, he was employee number 250 and the company's first full-time lawyer. By the time he left his post as the company's general counsel after Tesla acquired SolarCity last year, the company had about 12,000 employees, with 45 in the legal department. Weissman, who is being recognized this year as an In-House Impact Award winner for his work on the Tesla deal, explained to The Recorder how the job grew in complexity and how he helped SolarCity's board navigate the transaction.
Your work on the SolarCity sale has been described as walking a “transactional tightrope.” For those unfamiliar with the deal, can you outline what was most unusual and—for you as the GC at least—most legally complex to navigate? I think the complication arose mainly because the companies had the same board chair (Elon Musk) and because there were others who were either on both boards, or who were close familial relations to Elon (Pete and Lyndon Rive, his cousins). Thus, SolarCity decided to create a special committee of the board of directors that would engage counsel and bankers to consider the deal and guide the process. This special committee consisted of two board members, one of whom was our audit chair. They worked incredibly hard. Board members usually don't have to lead M&A deals, but in this case, they negotiated the deal, managed the lawyers and the bankers. In the end, 85 percent of the total shares voting approved the deal—and when you consider that at that time Elon owned 22 percent and did not vote—you see an overwhelming vote in favor of the deal. That shows me a really well-run process, with shareholders who really understood the intellectual underpinnings of the deal.
Besides the sale to Tesla, what would you say were the most challenging elements of your job at SolarCity? Nobody had ever attempted to do what we were doing. There was no “been there and done that” in the distributed solar industry. Every day we invented wheels and then the next day that wheel would look lumpy because what we thought was the best market approach did not turn out to be the most effective approach. Also, every day we would be challenged by incumbent utilities who did not want us competing on a level playing field with them. They did everything in their power to change the rules, to discredit the industry or to use their customers' money to tilt the governing regulators to their positions. Of course, not every state had the same challenges, but that was part of the Rubik's Cube. America has no centralized energy policy, so we literally had a different fight on our hands at the federal level, at the state level and sometimes even at the county or city level. I was employee 250 and when I left we had approximately 12,000 employees. When I joined I was the first full-time lawyer in the door and when I left we had 45 people in Legal alone, plus another 20 in Compliance and Risk Management, which also reported up to me.
Your LinkedIn profile lists you as FunEmployed. I suppose that's one of the benefits and hazards of successfully selling your company as a GC? I knew that after 8.5 years at SolarCity I needed a break. Tesla is another company that is trying to do something that has never been done before. I knew from my friends and colleagues there just how hard that was, and knew that I could not be the husband and father I wanted to be and continue working with the intensity I had for so many years. I've taken 2017 off and traveled, got a puppy and have gone back to school to get my executive coaching certification from CTI. It's been an amazing experience coaching successful and dynamic individuals, and I can't wait to bring those skills back to work.
You're looking for a new position, I gather. What are you looking for in your next position? Everything starts with a great executive team. One that trusts each other, that has productive and thoughtful conflict that results in solid buy-in about the company's direction and ultimately allows the executives to hold each other accountable for their contributions to the company. Ideally, I will join a company that will allow me to have the impact on the people side of the business I really love. I've been the VP of HR twice now (including SolarCity until it reached 1,000 employees) and I really love that work. We are on the cusp of a new reality where leaders realize that a company really is a legal fiction—that companies are little more than a group of people working together for common goals. I want to be a part of that next generation of leaders that brings their authentic selves to work every day, and encourages everyone around them to do the same. I want to bring a strong culture of living in service to the teams we lead, knowing that we as leaders can never be any better than the men and women who do us the honor of placing their trust in us to lead them. I want to continue my passion for hiring high EQ diverse teams and then seeing them grow.
When Seth Weissman arrived at SolarCity in 2008, he was employee number 250 and the company's first full-time lawyer. By the time he left his post as the company's general counsel after Tesla acquired SolarCity last year, the company had about 12,000 employees, with 45 in the legal department. Weissman, who is being recognized this year as an In-House Impact Award winner for his work on the Tesla deal, explained to The Recorder how the job grew in complexity and how he helped SolarCity's board navigate the transaction.
Your work on the SolarCity sale has been described as walking a “transactional tightrope.” For those unfamiliar with the deal, can you outline what was most unusual and—for you as the GC at least—most legally complex to navigate? I think the complication arose mainly because the companies had the same board chair (Elon Musk) and because there were others who were either on both boards, or who were close familial relations to Elon (Pete and Lyndon Rive, his cousins). Thus, SolarCity decided to create a special committee of the board of directors that would engage counsel and bankers to consider the deal and guide the process. This special committee consisted of two board members, one of whom was our audit chair. They worked incredibly hard. Board members usually don't have to lead M&A deals, but in this case, they negotiated the deal, managed the lawyers and the bankers. In the end, 85 percent of the total shares voting approved the deal—and when you consider that at that time Elon owned 22 percent and did not vote—you see an overwhelming vote in favor of the deal. That shows me a really well-run process, with shareholders who really understood the intellectual underpinnings of the deal.
Besides the sale to Tesla, what would you say were the most challenging elements of your job at SolarCity? Nobody had ever attempted to do what we were doing. There was no “been there and done that” in the distributed solar industry. Every day we invented wheels and then the next day that wheel would look lumpy because what we thought was the best market approach did not turn out to be the most effective approach. Also, every day we would be challenged by incumbent utilities who did not want us competing on a level playing field with them. They did everything in their power to change the rules, to discredit the industry or to use their customers' money to tilt the governing regulators to their positions. Of course, not every state had the same challenges, but that was part of the Rubik's Cube. America has no centralized energy policy, so we literally had a different fight on our hands at the federal level, at the state level and sometimes even at the county or city level. I was employee 250 and when I left we had approximately 12,000 employees. When I joined I was the first full-time lawyer in the door and when I left we had 45 people in Legal alone, plus another 20 in Compliance and Risk Management, which also reported up to me.
Your
You're looking for a new position, I gather. What are you looking for in your next position? Everything starts with a great executive team. One that trusts each other, that has productive and thoughtful conflict that results in solid buy-in about the company's direction and ultimately allows the executives to hold each other accountable for their contributions to the company. Ideally, I will join a company that will allow me to have the impact on the people side of the business I really love. I've been the VP of HR twice now (including SolarCity until it reached 1,000 employees) and I really love that work. We are on the cusp of a new reality where leaders realize that a company really is a legal fiction—that companies are little more than a group of people working together for common goals. I want to be a part of that next generation of leaders that brings their authentic selves to work every day, and encourages everyone around them to do the same. I want to bring a strong culture of living in service to the teams we lead, knowing that we as leaders can never be any better than the men and women who do us the honor of placing their trust in us to lead them. I want to continue my passion for hiring high EQ diverse teams and then seeing them grow.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
Delaware Supreme Court Asked If Ellison's Plans Affected Oracle's NetSuite Acquisition
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250