Bedsworth: Conclusions I've Drawn
I sit down every month feeling like I should start with an apology to all the people who will come to this page and think, "Aw jeez, not this guy again."
November 16, 2017 at 12:56 PM
17 minute read
I'm facing 70 and surgery this week. I don't know which of these things bears the greater responsibility for it, but I'm even less confident than usual in my ability to be funny this month.
That may surprise you. Guy tries to write humor all these years, you figure he must think he's funny. And I do. Sometimes.
But not always. I'm sure I amuse myself more than anyone else. I sit down every month feeling like I should start with an apology to all the people who will come to this page and think, “Aw jeez, not this guy again.”
But this month will be different. This month I won't try to be funny. This month I will try something even tougher: I'll try to be helpful.
After 47 years of practicing law, I've come to some conclusions about how it should be done. Setting a few of them out here saved me the task of being funny.
Why should you care? Because I am not only the luckiest man you ever met, I'm damn near the happiest.
At 70, my life is so good it's starting to undermine my faith in a just God. So I must be doing a few things right (even if writing these columns isn't one of them). Here's what I've concluded so far.
Conclusion 1: It's never your assistant's fault. Judge Robert Banyard taught me this almost 50 years ago. I was a young prosecutor sitting in Banyard's master calendar court waiting to be assigned out when an attorney who had failed to do something said it was his secretary's fault.
Banyard took him apart in sections. He pulverized him so completely it was necessary to call a recess so the custodian could come in and trowel the puddle off the floor. The stain is probably still there on the carpet. Made a big impression on me. I never blamed anything on my assistant.
Conclusion 2: It's probably no one else's fault either. Own your mistakes. Every one you admit to increases your credibility. People will be more likely to believe you when you say it isn't your fault.
And credibility is your stock in trade. Being smart is good, being articulate is good, being charming is good. But none of them has any value except as they make you credible. You will spend your whole professional life trying to get people to believe that you are the right person to believe. Admitting your mistakes is a great step in that direction.
Conclusion 3: What goes around comes around. This is the Hoyt Axton Rule. Axton was a folk-singer I liked a lot. But he had an admitted problem with substance abuse. I saw him perform several times when I thought he was under the influence, and he was notorious for missing performances entirely.[1]
I once saw him flub the opening of a song twice—each time coming in vocally ahead of his own instrumental accompaniment. As he started strumming the intro a third time, he said, “I'm just gonna wait for it this time; you wait long enough everything comes around again.”
Axton was right: Everything you do will come back to you eventually.
Conclusion 4: You want the things that come back to you to be good things.
What's more, they come back with interest. Compound interest.
Exhibit A: I have the best job in the system. No, not the legal system, the solar system.
You think I got this job by being brilliant? Of course not. That's the hard way to success, and I've never been much for doing things the hard way.
I got this job by being trustworthy—which is a lot easier.
I got this job because a lot of people trusted me. They trusted me because I had tried to treat them well. And they were kind enough to communicate that trust to a governor.
I try every day to be worthy of that trust. It's hard, but it's a whole helluva lot easier than being brilliant.
Treat people well and they will usually reciprocate. If they don't, they should familiarize themselves with Dante because they're headed to one of his circles of hell. And you don't want to be there to greet them.
Conclusion 5: “There is always a Diedrich case.” Judge John Conley taught me this one when we were in the District Attorney's Office.
I was promoted into Conley's job when he was promoted to another one. At the time I was working on new trial motions in the bribery and conspiracy convictions of Ralph Diedrich. Diedrich was the chairman of the Orange County Board of Supervisors until he was caught taking bribes. It was the biggest case of my life, and trying to learn my new job and plow through thousands of pages of complex record had me putting in long hours. Sleep and sunlight had become strictly conceptual.
One day Conley asked me how I liked my new job. My response was, “Well, it's kind of hard to say right now; I'm so swamped with the Diedrich case. I think it'll be fine after that.” Conley looked at me sympathetically and said, “Beds, there is always a Diedrich case.”
No matter how important the case you're handling now, there is another one—at least equally important, probably more—coming out of the chute in the next go-round. No case is worth sacrificing your credibility. No case is worth giving up the trust of your colleagues.
Conclusion 6: What you're doing is very difficult. Cut yourself some slack.
When I was a sophomore in high school I spent a frighteningly large part of my summer wages on bus fare and a box seat ticket behind home plate for a Dodger game. Sandy Koufax was pitching and I wanted to watch. I was a junior varsity catcher and I thought I could learn from watching the greatest pitcher of all time.[2]
Koufax lasted 2 2/3 innings. The Philadelphia Phillies, the second-worst team in baseball at the time, beat him like a rented mule. He was slightly less effective than the attorney who had blamed his mistake on his secretary, and the result was pretty much identical.
So for the last 55 years or so, whenever I've performed badly—or seen someone else perform badly—I've been able to remind myself that even Koufax had bad days. Practicing law—like pitching—is very difficult. It's so difficult we have at least one statute designed just to deal with falling on your sword after failing (Code of Civil Procedure Section 473). Forgive yourself and vow to get better.[3]
Conclusion 7: There is no greater engine on the planet for doing good than the American legal system. You went to law school to do good. That's all there is to it. That's the whole job description. And if you lose sight of that you might as well be selling aluminum siding.
Conclusion 8: We have been allowed to live a life of incredible privilege. My wife likes to remind me that the trick is who you compare yourself to. Forget the Lives of the Rich and Famous. If you don't have to hike through the desert with a jerry can to get water, you're lucky. Spend some time every day comparing yourself to people who really do have it tough.
Corollary 8b: Never lose sight of how good your life will still be, even if you lose this motion, this case, or this partnership. If you keep your eye on that ball, it will lower your blood pressure and improve your chances of taking advantage of the other conclusions.
Conclusion 9: Only the good die young. Medical science has lengthened not only lives, but careers. When I came out of law school my intention was to practice until I was 65. If I had to.
Now I'm 70 and I can't bring myself to quit. There are still too many opportunities to do good.
You're gonna be doing this a long time. Do it right.
[1] One night he was an FTA at The Troubador, and Doug Weston asked the audience to wait for an hour because he had called a young man to replace Axton that night and the kid was on his way. The kid turned out to be John Denver.
[2] Save your breath; I won't debate this.
[3] In my copy of the annotated codes, they've had to devote 424 pages to decisions applying Section 473. Apparently others have found it difficult to do this stuff.
Now re-read Conclusion 2.
William W. Bedsworth is an associate justice of the California Court of Appeal. He writes this column to get it out of his system. He can be contacted at [email protected]. And look for his new book, “Lawyers, Gubs, and Monkeys,” through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and Vandeplas Publishing.
I'm facing 70 and surgery this week. I don't know which of these things bears the greater responsibility for it, but I'm even less confident than usual in my ability to be funny this month.
That may surprise you. Guy tries to write humor all these years, you figure he must think he's funny. And I do. Sometimes.
But not always. I'm sure I amuse myself more than anyone else. I sit down every month feeling like I should start with an apology to all the people who will come to this page and think, “Aw jeez, not this guy again.”
But this month will be different. This month I won't try to be funny. This month I will try something even tougher: I'll try to be helpful.
After 47 years of practicing law, I've come to some conclusions about how it should be done. Setting a few of them out here saved me the task of being funny.
Why should you care? Because I am not only the luckiest man you ever met, I'm damn near the happiest.
At 70, my life is so good it's starting to undermine my faith in a just God. So I must be doing a few things right (even if writing these columns isn't one of them). Here's what I've concluded so far.
Conclusion 1: It's never your assistant's fault. Judge Robert Banyard taught me this almost 50 years ago. I was a young prosecutor sitting in Banyard's master calendar court waiting to be assigned out when an attorney who had failed to do something said it was his secretary's fault.
Banyard took him apart in sections. He pulverized him so completely it was necessary to call a recess so the custodian could come in and trowel the puddle off the floor. The stain is probably still there on the carpet. Made a big impression on me. I never blamed anything on my assistant.
Conclusion 2: It's probably no one else's fault either. Own your mistakes. Every one you admit to increases your credibility. People will be more likely to believe you when you say it isn't your fault.
And credibility is your stock in trade. Being smart is good, being articulate is good, being charming is good. But none of them has any value except as they make you credible. You will spend your whole professional life trying to get people to believe that you are the right person to believe. Admitting your mistakes is a great step in that direction.
Conclusion 3: What goes around comes around. This is the Hoyt Axton Rule. Axton was a folk-singer I liked a lot. But he had an admitted problem with substance abuse. I saw him perform several times when I thought he was under the influence, and he was notorious for missing performances entirely.[1]
I once saw him flub the opening of a song twice—each time coming in vocally ahead of his own instrumental accompaniment. As he started strumming the intro a third time, he said, “I'm just gonna wait for it this time; you wait long enough everything comes around again.”
Axton was right: Everything you do will come back to you eventually.
Conclusion 4: You want the things that come back to you to be good things.
What's more, they come back with interest. Compound interest.
Exhibit A: I have the best job in the system. No, not the legal system, the solar system.
You think I got this job by being brilliant? Of course not. That's the hard way to success, and I've never been much for doing things the hard way.
I got this job by being trustworthy—which is a lot easier.
I got this job because a lot of people trusted me. They trusted me because I had tried to treat them well. And they were kind enough to communicate that trust to a governor.
I try every day to be worthy of that trust. It's hard, but it's a whole helluva lot easier than being brilliant.
Treat people well and they will usually reciprocate. If they don't, they should familiarize themselves with Dante because they're headed to one of his circles of hell. And you don't want to be there to greet them.
Conclusion 5: “There is always a Diedrich case.” Judge John Conley taught me this one when we were in the District Attorney's Office.
I was promoted into Conley's job when he was promoted to another one. At the time I was working on new trial motions in the bribery and conspiracy convictions of Ralph Diedrich. Diedrich was the chairman of the Orange County Board of Supervisors until he was caught taking bribes. It was the biggest case of my life, and trying to learn my new job and plow through thousands of pages of complex record had me putting in long hours. Sleep and sunlight had become strictly conceptual.
One day Conley asked me how I liked my new job. My response was, “Well, it's kind of hard to say right now; I'm so swamped with the Diedrich case. I think it'll be fine after that.” Conley looked at me sympathetically and said, “Beds, there is always a Diedrich case.”
No matter how important the case you're handling now, there is another one—at least equally important, probably more—coming out of the chute in the next go-round. No case is worth sacrificing your credibility. No case is worth giving up the trust of your colleagues.
Conclusion 6: What you're doing is very difficult. Cut yourself some slack.
When I was a sophomore in high school I spent a frighteningly large part of my summer wages on bus fare and a box seat ticket behind home plate for a Dodger game. Sandy Koufax was pitching and I wanted to watch. I was a junior varsity catcher and I thought I could learn from watching the greatest pitcher of all time.[2]
Koufax lasted 2 2/3 innings. The Philadelphia Phillies, the second-worst team in baseball at the time, beat him like a rented mule. He was slightly less effective than the attorney who had blamed his mistake on his secretary, and the result was pretty much identical.
So for the last 55 years or so, whenever I've performed badly—or seen someone else perform badly—I've been able to remind myself that even Koufax had bad days. Practicing law—like pitching—is very difficult. It's so difficult we have at least one statute designed just to deal with falling on your sword after failing (Code of Civil Procedure Section 473). Forgive yourself and vow to get better.[3]
Conclusion 7: There is no greater engine on the planet for doing good than the American legal system. You went to law school to do good. That's all there is to it. That's the whole job description. And if you lose sight of that you might as well be selling aluminum siding.
Conclusion 8: We have been allowed to live a life of incredible privilege. My wife likes to remind me that the trick is who you compare yourself to. Forget the Lives of the Rich and Famous. If you don't have to hike through the desert with a jerry can to get water, you're lucky. Spend some time every day comparing yourself to people who really do have it tough.
Corollary 8b: Never lose sight of how good your life will still be, even if you lose this motion, this case, or this partnership. If you keep your eye on that ball, it will lower your blood pressure and improve your chances of taking advantage of the other conclusions.
Conclusion 9: Only the good die young. Medical science has lengthened not only lives, but careers. When I came out of law school my intention was to practice until I was 65. If I had to.
Now I'm 70 and I can't bring myself to quit. There are still too many opportunities to do good.
You're gonna be doing this a long time. Do it right.
[1] One night he was an FTA at The Troubador, and Doug Weston asked the audience to wait for an hour because he had called a young man to replace Axton that night and the kid was on his way. The kid turned out to be John Denver.
[2] Save your breath; I won't debate this.
[3] In my copy of the annotated codes, they've had to devote 424 pages to decisions applying Section 473. Apparently others have found it difficult to do this stuff.
Now re-read Conclusion 2.
William W. Bedsworth is an associate justice of the California Court of Appeal. He writes this column to get it out of his system. He can be contacted at [email protected]. And look for his new book, “Lawyers, Gubs, and Monkeys,” through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and Vandeplas Publishing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCo-Founder and Startup Divorce: Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
'Get Laid Off With Me' on TikTok: What Employers Must Know About This New Trend
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250