Judge Tosses Bulk of Male Managers' Yahoo Gender Discrimination Lawsuit
A federal judge in San Jose has knocked most of the gender discrimination claims brought by two men who used to be editors for Yahoo's website.
November 16, 2017 at 06:44 PM
9 minute read
A federal judge in San Jose has knocked most of the gender discrimination claims brought by two men who used to be editors for Yahoo's website.
Gregory Anderson and Scott Ard sued Yahoo last year claiming they were pushed out of the company by female managers discriminating against men in effort to promote and hire women. They also claimed Yahoo's forced ranking system, which aimed to eliminate low performers and unnecessary levels of management, was a pretense for conducting mass layoffs in violation of state and federal laws designed to protect workers.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins of the Northern District of California largely sided with Yahoo in a 31-page order filed under seal Nov. 8 and made public Thursday. Cousins dismissed all the plaintiffs' claims except one: Ard's claim that he faced disparate treatment when passed over when the company hired a woman to fill the position of editor-in-chief of the Autos digital magazine at Yahoo prior to his dismissal.
“Anderson has not provided any evidence that his termination had anything to do with his gender other than his feelings that he was being discriminated against,” Cousins wrote.
Cousins also found there was no evidence to support Ard's claim that he was retaliated against for speaking up for male employees whose scores were adjusted downward during Yahoo's quarterly review process. “Ard did stand up for employees who were being terminated or who received low QPR scores,” Cousins wrote. “However, there is no record of Ard complaining to management about the treatment of men while he worked at Yahoo.”
The case moved to the summary judgment phase just as the discussion about gender diversity in Silicon Valley reached a fever pitch this fall after a Google engineer was fired for writing a memo arguing women are biologically less adept at technology. The ruling comes as numerous tech companies, including Twitter and Google, are facing more traditional gender pay discrimination suits brought on behalf of women.
The former employees' lawyer, Palo Alto-based attorney Jon Parsons, didn't immediately respond to an email message Thursday afternoon. Yahoo's lead lawyer, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius partner Melinda Riechert, directed a request for comment to the company. Yahoo representatives didn't immediately respond.
A federal judge in San Jose has knocked most of the gender discrimination claims brought by two men who used to be editors for Yahoo's website.
U.S. Magistrate Judge
“Anderson has not provided any evidence that his termination had anything to do with his gender other than his feelings that he was being discriminated against,” Cousins wrote.
Cousins also found there was no evidence to support Ard's claim that he was retaliated against for speaking up for male employees whose scores were adjusted downward during Yahoo's quarterly review process. “Ard did stand up for employees who were being terminated or who received low QPR scores,” Cousins wrote. “However, there is no record of Ard complaining to management about the treatment of men while he worked at Yahoo.”
The case moved to the summary judgment phase just as the discussion about gender diversity in Silicon Valley reached a fever pitch this fall after a
The former employees' lawyer, Palo Alto-based attorney Jon Parsons, didn't immediately respond to an email message Thursday afternoon. Yahoo's lead lawyer,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250