Judge Tosses Bulk of Male Managers' Yahoo Gender Discrimination Lawsuit
A federal judge in San Jose has knocked most of the gender discrimination claims brought by two men who used to be editors for Yahoo's website.
November 16, 2017 at 06:44 PM
9 minute read
A federal judge in San Jose has knocked most of the gender discrimination claims brought by two men who used to be editors for Yahoo's website.
Gregory Anderson and Scott Ard sued Yahoo last year claiming they were pushed out of the company by female managers discriminating against men in effort to promote and hire women. They also claimed Yahoo's forced ranking system, which aimed to eliminate low performers and unnecessary levels of management, was a pretense for conducting mass layoffs in violation of state and federal laws designed to protect workers.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins of the Northern District of California largely sided with Yahoo in a 31-page order filed under seal Nov. 8 and made public Thursday. Cousins dismissed all the plaintiffs' claims except one: Ard's claim that he faced disparate treatment when passed over when the company hired a woman to fill the position of editor-in-chief of the Autos digital magazine at Yahoo prior to his dismissal.
“Anderson has not provided any evidence that his termination had anything to do with his gender other than his feelings that he was being discriminated against,” Cousins wrote.
Cousins also found there was no evidence to support Ard's claim that he was retaliated against for speaking up for male employees whose scores were adjusted downward during Yahoo's quarterly review process. “Ard did stand up for employees who were being terminated or who received low QPR scores,” Cousins wrote. “However, there is no record of Ard complaining to management about the treatment of men while he worked at Yahoo.”
The case moved to the summary judgment phase just as the discussion about gender diversity in Silicon Valley reached a fever pitch this fall after a Google engineer was fired for writing a memo arguing women are biologically less adept at technology. The ruling comes as numerous tech companies, including Twitter and Google, are facing more traditional gender pay discrimination suits brought on behalf of women.
The former employees' lawyer, Palo Alto-based attorney Jon Parsons, didn't immediately respond to an email message Thursday afternoon. Yahoo's lead lawyer, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius partner Melinda Riechert, directed a request for comment to the company. Yahoo representatives didn't immediately respond.
A federal judge in San Jose has knocked most of the gender discrimination claims brought by two men who used to be editors for Yahoo's website.
U.S. Magistrate Judge
“Anderson has not provided any evidence that his termination had anything to do with his gender other than his feelings that he was being discriminated against,” Cousins wrote.
Cousins also found there was no evidence to support Ard's claim that he was retaliated against for speaking up for male employees whose scores were adjusted downward during Yahoo's quarterly review process. “Ard did stand up for employees who were being terminated or who received low QPR scores,” Cousins wrote. “However, there is no record of Ard complaining to management about the treatment of men while he worked at Yahoo.”
The case moved to the summary judgment phase just as the discussion about gender diversity in Silicon Valley reached a fever pitch this fall after a
The former employees' lawyer, Palo Alto-based attorney Jon Parsons, didn't immediately respond to an email message Thursday afternoon. Yahoo's lead lawyer,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute readK&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
3 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250