PricewaterhouseCoopers Can't Keep Secret Would-Be Class Size in Age Discrimination Suit
A federal magistrate judge has denied an effort by PricewaterhouseCoopers to seal the number of would-be class members in an age discrimination suit that claims the accounting and consulting firm unlawfully struck older job applicants from employment consideration. The plaintiff's attorneys estimated that some 14,000 potential job applicants over age 40 could be part of the affected class.
November 17, 2017 at 03:04 PM
4 minute read
A federal magistrate judge has denied an effort by PricewaterhouseCoopers to seal the number of would-be class members in an age discrimination suit that claims the accounting and consulting firm unlawfully struck older job applicants from employment consideration.
The lawsuit, filed last year in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by the AARP Foundation Litigation and the law firm Outten & Golden, alleges the hiring practices at PricewaterhouseCoopers are discriminatory.
The plaintiff's attorneys estimated that some 14,000 potential job applicants over age 40 could be part of the affected class. That number, until this week, had been confidential.
PwC's lawyers at Kirkland & Ellis have argued that only existing employees can bring such claims, not prospective ones. The lawsuit is one of several pending in courts across the country that confront alleged hiring discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. No class has been certified in the PwC case.
“The number of potential plaintiffs in this case is not privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to legal protection,” Outten & Golden's Jahan Sagafi in San Francisco, the lead attorney working with the AARP, said in a court filing.
The company argued in court documents that the number of potential class members should be sealed because it could possibly include confidential information. The Kirkland team argued in court papers: “PwC disputes plaintiffs' estimate, which is misleading given neither a class nor a collective has been certified.”
Emily Nicklin, a Kirkland partner in Chicago, said the request was not unusual. “Courts have come down in different places on it,” Nicklin said. “It's her job to call balls and strikes.”
Nicklin called the lawsuit's claim that the company used the standard of disparate impact to discrimination “novel.”
“It's an understatement that the client has a strong defense,” she said. PwC is tremendously inclusive, not just because they follow the law but because they want to build the best possible workplace on a non-discriminatory basis. That's what the case will show.”
Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Credit: Jason Doiy/ The RecorderU.S. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim of the Northern District of California on Nov. 15 didn't spend a lot of time writing her one-paragraph order rejecting PwC's request to seal.
“Defendant seeks to seal the number of potential class members involved in the litigation,” Kim wrote in her ruling. “The number of potential members or number of members in the class is not confidential, and therefore the request is denied.”
AARP attorney Dan Kohrman in Washington said the estimated number of class members reflects unsuccessful PwC applicants over age 40. He said the data to determine the class is complex and requires additional analysis.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of 53-year-old certified public accountant Steve Rabin, who claims the firm has a low number of older workers in entry-level and lower- to midlevel positions because of its practices of hiring workers at this level through campus recruiters and not posting entry-level opportunities to its website.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
5 minute readCourt rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250