Judge: Warriors Must Face Claims that Android App Snooped on Fans
A federal judge in Oakland has breathed new life into a lawsuit against the Golden State Warriors and a company that it partnered with to deliver targeted advertising to fans via its Android app.
November 20, 2017 at 06:29 PM
6 minute read
A federal judge in Oakland has breathed new life into a lawsuit against the Golden State Warriors and a company that it partnered with to deliver targeted advertising to fans via its Android app.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White of the Northern District of California on Monday denied the National Basketball Association team's motion to dismiss a proposed privacy class action that claims the Warriors Android app acts essentially as a bug, recording fans' private conversations while it runs in the background.
The Warriors app uses so-called proximity technology to serve location-specific ads and promotions on game days. The app accesses microphones on mobile devices to listen for unique audio signals produced by beacons placed around the team's home arena to determine fans' locations—something the team has claimed in court papers nearly 90 percent of Major League Baseball teams and half of NBA teams do to serve up location-specific promotions in their home stadiums.
Lawyers at Edelson PC sued the team in August 2016 alleging that the app intercepted fan communication in violation of the federal Wiretap Act, which carries statutory penalties of $10,000 per violation.
White in February largely sided with the team and co-defendants in an earlier motion to dismiss finding that Edelson lawyers had failed to offer details that would support their theory that the app used the content of LaTisha Satchell's conversations rather than her location to conjure targeted ads. But in Monday's order, White found that Satchell's lawyers had put forward “at least four instances where she had her phone with her, the app was running, and she had conversations about private matters, including nonpublic information during a business meeting and private financial matters.”
Michael Rhodes of Cooley, who represents the team and co-defendant Sonic Notify Inc. , which developed the app's underlying beacon technology, declined to comment when reached by email Monday. A spokesman for the Warriors didn't immediately respond to an email message. Likewise, representatives of Sonic Notify could not immediately be reached.
Edelson's Rafey Balabanian said in a phone interview Monday afternoon that plaintiff had amended her complaint to show that she had carried her phone into otherwise private areas such as business meeting and her bedside table.
“The reality is that she's able to allege that the app was running in the background when she was having private conversations,” he said. “The bottom line is it's being recorded. There's all types of things in this world where you don't think something is being recorded.”
Raymond Ridder, the team's vice president of communications, cited team policy in saying the Warriors would have no comment.
A federal judge in Oakland has breathed new life into a lawsuit against the Golden State Warriors and a company that it partnered with to deliver targeted advertising to fans via its Android app.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White of the Northern District of California on Monday denied the National Basketball Association team's motion to dismiss a proposed privacy class action that claims the Warriors Android app acts essentially as a bug, recording fans' private conversations while it runs in the background.
The Warriors app uses so-called proximity technology to serve location-specific ads and promotions on game days. The app accesses microphones on mobile devices to listen for unique audio signals produced by beacons placed around the team's home arena to determine fans' locations—something the team has claimed in court papers nearly 90 percent of Major League Baseball teams and half of NBA teams do to serve up location-specific promotions in their home stadiums.
Lawyers at Edelson PC sued the team in August 2016 alleging that the app intercepted fan communication in violation of the federal Wiretap Act, which carries statutory penalties of $10,000 per violation.
White in February largely sided with the team and co-defendants in an earlier motion to dismiss finding that Edelson lawyers had failed to offer details that would support their theory that the app used the content of LaTisha Satchell's conversations rather than her location to conjure targeted ads. But in Monday's order, White found that Satchell's lawyers had put forward “at least four instances where she had her phone with her, the app was running, and she had conversations about private matters, including nonpublic information during a business meeting and private financial matters.”
Michael Rhodes of
Edelson's Rafey Balabanian said in a phone interview Monday afternoon that plaintiff had amended her complaint to show that she had carried her phone into otherwise private areas such as business meeting and her bedside table.
“The reality is that she's able to allege that the app was running in the background when she was having private conversations,” he said. “The bottom line is it's being recorded. There's all types of things in this world where you don't think something is being recorded.”
Raymond Ridder, the team's vice president of communications, cited team policy in saying the Warriors would have no comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
4 minute read‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readState Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250