How to Get Out of a Job Rut
Being in a job for “a long time” is kind of like sitting in your favorite easy chair. It's comfortable. It's familiar. It's ... easy.…
November 22, 2017 at 01:10 PM
8 minute read
Being in a job for “a long time” is kind of like sitting in your favorite easy chair. It's comfortable. It's familiar. It's … easy. But there are downsides of sitting in it too long. Professional downsides as well. Unless you are learning new things and growing as a professional it is almost certain that you are on career autopilot. Punching in … and punching out. That's not a career … That's a J.O.B. And most professionals cannot stay truly happy in a J.O.B. for very long. So the desire to seek something more meaningful becomes a driving career … and happiness force.
But being out of the job market for many years comes with its own set of challenges. To start, the job search protocols in today's legal market are vastly different than the profession of old. Everything's changed: interview attire, resume “rules,” job applications, interview questions, employer expectations, corporate/workplace vernacular, the nature of legal roles and work cultures to name a few. And if you've been in cruise control for many years, you probably haven't given much, if any thought as to what truly interests and inspires you professionally. Leaving you in a mental no-man's-land regarding your next career chapter.
So where to start? What to do? How to do it?
First, take a deep breath … and don't panic. You will find your path. I promise. But it's critical to understand that in order to break your fear and paralysis—and get out of your rut, the first major step will require a plan to gain self awareness of the professional You: your good and bad, likes and dislikes, wants and needs, musts and must nots. So set aside some quality time and sharpen your pencil. On a piece of paper, write down and answer the following questions … in detail. If you're not sure how much is enough, a good guide is to provide at least 10 granular examples for each question and sub-question.
|- What are your skill strengths—In what way do you excel? Substantively, socially, managerially, professionally.
- What are your skill weaknesses—What skills are lacking or just so-so?
- What do you enjoy doing most—Helping people? Doing deals? Managing? Writing? Meeting with clients? Being creative? Crunching numbers? Working alone? Working as a team? Being the boss? Taking risks? Building things?
- What do you not enjoy doing?
- What kind of culture appeals best to you … and why?
- What are the key qualities in a job you need to be happy?
- What are the qualities that would make you miserable?
- Describe the perfect job: The role, the employer, the colleagues, the money, the title, the hours, the location. All of it.
- Are there any roles or other professions that intrigue you? If so, what is it about these things that appeal to you?
- Would you be willing or able to go back to school or take a big pay cut to pursue a totally different career direction?
- How much money do you need to be happy? Are you willing to trade off money for other job qualities? If so, what are they?
- Do you have short, medium and long-term career goals? If so, are they still applicable or do they need a refresh? If not, you'll need to set them as soon as possible.
Embarking on this personal and professional exploration is not for the faint of heart. It's hard work—no question about it. But if you want to move the needle closer to a meaningful career, it's imperative that you invest the time and effort to know thyself. Without this awareness, you'll remain stuck in neutral indefinitely and your career and happiness will suffer. So take as much time as you need to work through this step until a clear understanding emerges. Once it does, you'll be ready to move to the next step of your plan … and closer to second gear.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250