How to Get the Dirt From a Reference Check (Part 2: Pre-Call Prep)
Speaking with a candidate's references provides an employer with a unique opportunity to gain more insight into the person they're about to hire. But many employers don't see it this way. Their referencing experience has given them a different opinion—based on unhelpful vanilla, cookie-cutter feedback and in some cases, no feedback at all.
December 07, 2017 at 11:50 AM
7 minute read
Speaking with a candidate's references provides an employer with a unique opportunity to gain more insight into the person they're about to hire. But many employers don't see it this way. Their referencing experience has given them a different opinion—based on unhelpful vanilla, cookie-cutter feedback and in some cases, no feedback at all. In Part 2 of this question, I will examine the best approach to take—before the reference call occurs …
… Because maximizing value from a candidate reference starts before the call is ever made—by building a foundation for success. Below is where an employer should start.
Conduct the Reference Check Yourself.
If you are the hiring manager and want to maximize a candidate reference, you need to conduct the reference call yourself. I understand that hiring managers are busy. But you know this role better than anyone. You know what you want and you know what you need. And you know the candidate profile that will succeed. So you are the best person suited to peel the onion on this candidate's past. The stakes are high, so commit the effort.
Be Clear About the References You Want.
Provide candidates with specific guidance upfront about the number and type of professional references you want them to provide. This will increase the likelihood that you'll have relevant and high quality references to tap. The best: a current boss, current clients and current peers. But that's not likely. Next best: a former boss, former peers, former clients and anyone with whom the candidate has worked closely. Forget about personal references (unless she is someone famous you'd like to talk to). The praise will be universally effusive … and universally unhelpful.
Be Prepared.
The effectiveness of your reference discussion will hinge on how prepared you are going in to the call. Here's what you should know beforehand:
- What are the most important qualities (substantive, experience, cultural) a candidate must possess in order for you to hire him/her for this position?
- What have you learned about this candidate to date? How does he or she stack up in the areas above? Are there any concerns? If so, what are they? Is there still information you want/need to know about this candidate?
- What are your goals for the reference call? What do you want to learn, understand, validate? Be specific.
- What questions are you going to ask in order to achieve your goals? (Part 3 will cover specific question samples).
Take the Time.
The more time you spend with a candidate reference, the more you will learn. There's no way you'll gain any meaningful insight in a 15-minute call. So book 30-45 minutes for each conversation. Minimum.
Once you've created the foundation, you'll be ready for a productive call. In Part 3, I will provide a recommended strategy once you're engaged in the conversation. And will also offer several specific questions to ask in order to extract the most revealing information about your desired hire.
Julie Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
Speaking with a candidate's references provides an employer with a unique opportunity to gain more insight into the person they're about to hire. But many employers don't see it this way. Their referencing experience has given them a different opinion—based on unhelpful vanilla, cookie-cutter feedback and in some cases, no feedback at all. In Part 2 of this question, I will examine the best approach to take—before the reference call occurs …
… Because maximizing value from a candidate reference starts before the call is ever made—by building a foundation for success. Below is where an employer should start.
Conduct the Reference Check Yourself.
If you are the hiring manager and want to maximize a candidate reference, you need to conduct the reference call yourself. I understand that hiring managers are busy. But you know this role better than anyone. You know what you want and you know what you need. And you know the candidate profile that will succeed. So you are the best person suited to peel the onion on this candidate's past. The stakes are high, so commit the effort.
Be Clear About the References You Want.
Provide candidates with specific guidance upfront about the number and type of professional references you want them to provide. This will increase the likelihood that you'll have relevant and high quality references to tap. The best: a current boss, current clients and current peers. But that's not likely. Next best: a former boss, former peers, former clients and anyone with whom the candidate has worked closely. Forget about personal references (unless she is someone famous you'd like to talk to). The praise will be universally effusive … and universally unhelpful.
Be Prepared.
The effectiveness of your reference discussion will hinge on how prepared you are going in to the call. Here's what you should know beforehand:
- What are the most important qualities (substantive, experience, cultural) a candidate must possess in order for you to hire him/her for this position?
- What have you learned about this candidate to date? How does he or she stack up in the areas above? Are there any concerns? If so, what are they? Is there still information you want/need to know about this candidate?
- What are your goals for the reference call? What do you want to learn, understand, validate? Be specific.
- What questions are you going to ask in order to achieve your goals? (Part 3 will cover specific question samples).
Take the Time.
The more time you spend with a candidate reference, the more you will learn. There's no way you'll gain any meaningful insight in a 15-minute call. So book 30-45 minutes for each conversation. Minimum.
Once you've created the foundation, you'll be ready for a productive call. In Part 3, I will provide a recommended strategy once you're engaged in the conversation. And will also offer several specific questions to ask in order to extract the most revealing information about your desired hire.
Julie Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFaegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute readAnapol Weiss Acquires Boutique Led by Star Litigator Alexandra Walsh
5 minute readPierson Ferdinand Lures Veteran M&A Specialist From Sheppard Mullin in Silicon Valley
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250