N. Randy Smith to Take Senior Status, Opening Up Another Ninth Circuit Seat
Judge N. Randy Smith of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has announced that he will be taking senior status next year, opening up another spot to fill for President Donald Trump on the nation's largest federal appellate court.
December 14, 2017 at 06:13 PM
3 minute read
Judge N. Randy Smith of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has announced that he will be taking senior status next year, opening up another spot to fill for President Donald Trump on the nation's largest federal appellate court.
Smith, a President George W. Bush appointee, announced his intention to go senior on Aug. 11, 2018, but indicated that he intends to take cases as a senior judge. “I look forward to continuing service to our country,” wrote Smith in a Dec. 1 letter to Trump. “However, at that time, I wish to provide another opportunity for an Idaho lawyer to serve here.”
Smith, a native of southeastern Idaho, previously served as a state judge for the Sixth District in Pocatello, Idaho, where he keeps his Ninth Circuit chambers. He was nominated to two different vacancies on the Ninth Circuit by Bush before eventually being confirmed in 2007.
Smith was initially nominated in late 2005 to a seat vacated by Judge Stephen Trott, who kept chambers in Boise. However, California's U.S. senators argued Smith shouldn't fill a “California seat” at the Ninth Circuit, since Trott was confirmed while a Californian and initially kept chambers in the state. Smith was eventually nominated and confirmed in early 2007 to a seat vacated by fellow Idahoan Judge Thomas Nelson.
While serving on the Ninth Circuit, Smith most notably wrote the dissenting opinion in Perry v. Brown, the Ninth Circuit decision that found California's Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.
“Our personal views regarding the political and sociological debate on marriage equality are irrelevant to our task,” wrote Smith in the opening of his dissent. Smith wrote that Proposition 8 should be decided under rational basis review taking into account whether the government action was rationally related to a legitimate public purpose. He found that a number of the reasons set forth for the proposition, including that it promoted “responsible procreation” and “optimal parenting,” met that low threshold.
Smith's move gives Trump yet another seat to fill on the court, which he has repeatedly criticized. In September, Trump nominated Ryan Bounds, an assistant U.S. attorney in Portland and former clerk for Ninth Circuit Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain, to fill the seat left open when O'Scannlain took senior status at the end of last year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute readK&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
3 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250