Reinhardt, a Prolific SCOTUS Feeder Judge, Tells Clerks 'Don't Count on Me'
Ninth Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt said in a recent interview that, despite his track record of sending clerks to the high court, he doesn't push his clerks to the justices.
December 14, 2017 at 11:25 PM
6 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO—It would seem that law students interested in nabbing a coveted clerkship with the U.S. Supreme Court might consider applying first to Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
After all, 18 former Reinhardt clerks have landed high court clerkships since 2005. Only a handful of federal appellate judges have a better record, according to a recent survey of Supreme Court clerks by the National Law Journal, a sibling publication to The Recorder.
But here's a tip: Don't tell Reinhardt you're drawn to him because of his reputation as a SCOTUS feeder.
Exclusive Report: SCOTUS ClerksThis article is part of a series examining the professional pathways and diversity of Supreme Court law clerks.• A Look Inside the Elite World of Supreme Court Law Clerks“If they're aiming to go to the Supreme Court, I tell them to work for one of these others at the D.C. Circuit where they have constant contact [with the court],” said Reinhardt during a recent interview in his visiting chambers in the Ninth Circuit's San Francisco headquarters. “I think there are others who really push hard for their clerks because it's good for them. I don't because I just want to get clerks who want to work for me.”
Among federal circuit courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has sent the second-highest number of clerks on to the U.S. Supreme Court during the tenure of Chief Justice John Roberts, according to the NLJ's data. Of the total 487 Supreme Court clerks for the period, more than 70, or nearly or 15 percent, came from the Ninth Circuit.
Reinhardt's advice to potential clerks about the D.C. Circuit is correct. The Ninth Circuit tally was surpassed by the smaller U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which saw roughly 170 clerks land positions at the high court during the period.
Reinhardt said he attributes his personal record of landing clerks at the high court “to the fact that I get the best clerks, and at least five of the justices know that.”
Among current justices over the past dozen years, Reinhardt, one of the most liberal federal appellate judges in the country, has placed two clerks each with Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Elena Kagan, three with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, four with Justice Sonia Sotomayor and two with Justice Anthony Kennedy, a former Ninth Circuit colleague.
Former Reinhardt clerk Andrew Crespo, now a professor at Harvard Law School, also clerked for Breyer and Kagan.
“I tell my clerks, 'Don't count on me.' I don't do anything to push them ordinarily,” Reinhardt said. “I have a problem doing that, and I think they all know it. My clerks are all so good. I hate to single one out above the others, and I don't really know at the end of the year which one's the best. Justice Sotomayor and Justice Breyer, in particular, get frustrated when I refuse to say it's the best one I have, because I don't really know.”
As for his own selection process, Reinhardt said he relies on the recommendations of a network of former clerks who are now law professors: Harvard's Crespo; Yale Law School Dean Heather Gerken; Jeffrey Fisher, the co-director of Stanford's Supreme Court Litigation Clinic; and “four or five” former clerks at Michigan among them.
Reinhardt expressed concern about the lack of diversity among the clerks the Supreme Court ultimately takes up. According to the NLJ's survey, 13 of the 18 Reinhardt clerks who have gone on to serve at the high court were men and 14 were white. Reinhardt says he always tried to have a diverse group of clerks himself, but he said one would have to ask the justices about why they hire who they hire.
“I always tell my clerks I want to have a diverse group, but it's not always easy to get them,” Reinhardt said. “One reason is they're in great demand, because there are other judges who also recruit them.”
Other Ninth Circuit Feeders
According to the data, three Ninth Circuit Judges besides Reinhardt landed among the top 20 feeder judges in the country—former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski and Judges Diarmuid O'Scannlain and William Fletcher.
At least 24 former Kozinski clerks have gone on to clerk on the Supreme Court, including 14 hired by Justice Anthony Kennedy alone. Kozinski clerked for Kennedy when the justice previously served on the Ninth Circuit. Kozinski's influence on Kennedy and the court will almost undoubtedly take a hit in the wake of allegations of lewd behavior and inappropriate comments from female clerks and externs, which have resulted in a formal complaint being filed against him by the Ninth Circuit's chief judge. More than a dozen O'Scannlain clerks, and at least seven former Fletcher clerks landed Supreme Court clerkships between 2005 and 2017. (The National Law Journal's study tracked only immediate past clerkships.)
Kozinski, who sat for an interview for this story prior to the Washington Post's Dec. 8 story detailing allegations from six former Ninth Circuit clerks and externs, said his record of placing clerks was a point of pride and that, if one looked at a longer period of time, he'd likely top the NLJ's list of feeder judges, instead of ranking No. 4, since he's been on the Ninth Circuit bench since 1985.
At the same time, Kozinski says “I actually don't believe in the notion of a feeder judge, really.”
“I think it's sort of backward,” said Kozinski of the concept. “Once you become a feeder judge, you tend to attract the kind of people who are likely to go on. In some sense it's self-perpetuating.”
Miscellany
According to the survey data, Ninth Circuit Judges M. Margaret McKeown, Sandra Ikuta and Paul Watford, an Obama appointee, have each sent at least two clerks to the court. U.S District Judge Charles Breyer has sent three clerks—two hired by his brother, Justice Stephen Breyer and one hired by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. California Supreme Court Justice Goodwin Liu on the California Supreme Court has sent at least two.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Practice Tips From—and About—the New Judges on the Northern District of California Bench
Trending Stories
- 1Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 2Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 3Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 4Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 5Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250