Will In-House Opportunities in California Grow With Budding Cannabis Industry?
With California's legalization of recreational marijuana sales, the outside-counsel-only approach for cannabis companies could go up in smoke.
December 14, 2017 at 12:22 PM
3 minute read
Wikimedia
In less than a month, Californians will be able to legally buy weed just for fun.
While recreational marijuana usage has been legal in the Golden State throughout 2017, the sale of non-medical marijuana was still against the law. That's changing on Jan. 1, 2018.
And though California's cannabis industry is still facing some speed bumps, bringing the currently-underground recreational market into the light of day means more customers and more money. A study from University of California Agricultural Issues Center at UC-Davis estimated the state's recreational marijuana sales could reach $5 billion a year.
It's an expansion that could turn small companies into big ones—ones that need full in-house legal departments, a cannabis industry rarity today.
“As companies get bigger, then people may see the need for a GC,” said Burke Hansen, a San Francisco-based cannabis attorney at Hallinan and Hallinan. “The way it works now is most businesses have a regular attorney they work with but not a formal in-house counsel relationship.”
That's the relationship Nicole Howell Neubert, a principal at Clark Neubert, has with a few cannabis companies. She's been on the legal side of the cannabis industry for years, and she guides companies on everything from general corporate issues, including financing and structuring, to marijuana-specific regulations. In the months leading up to 2018, she's also worked with cannabis companies of all sizes to secure local permits necessary to apply to sell recreational marijuana.
Companies are also prepping for the new licensing fee structure for marijuana in the state. Fees depend on the company's size and purpose. Companies that transport marijuana and don't need to quality test the product they deliver would only pay $500. But the largest distributors, which do have to test, would pay $125,000 annually to stay licensed.
A growing market also means more deals, and cannabis companies in California may need more legal firepower to carry out mergers and acquisitions.
Neubert says that as the industry grows from small and niche to large and becomes relatively accessible to adult consumers, cannabis companies will begin to look more like regular businesses, potentially with the in-house lawyers to match. A background in cannabis law may be helpful, but attorneys looking to go in-house at a marijuana company mostly need the same skills as they would in any other industry.
“These businesses, like all other businesses, need lawyers of all practice areas,” she said. “They need good litigators, they need estate planners and they need good corporate counsel. On some basic level these are just businesses. They've had to exist in this nonprofit land and haven't been a traditional business until now. But they will be very much so next year, with opportunities for all kinds of attorneys who aren't [cannabis] specialists.”
Still, smaller and midsized cannabis companies may stick with the current outside general counsel model, at least for the moment. Neubert says developing an in-house team may not yet be financially viable for these players. But that doesn't mean lawyers shouldn't be paying attention to the growing industry and their potential role in it.
“I would encourage folks interested in entering the industry to focus on their specialist area,” Neubert said. “Focus on your strengths because the businesses need really good lawyers of all practice areas.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readJudge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
Inside Track: How 2 Big Financial Stories—an Antitrust Case and a Megamerger—Became Intertwined
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250