How to Get the Dirt From a Reference Check (Part 3: The Call, the Questions, the Clues)
Checking candidate references does not have to be an exercise in futility. It can be a valuable part of the interviewing process that can confirm doubts, reinforce good feelings or make you think twice.
December 15, 2017 at 12:01 PM
4 minute read
Julie Brush
After understanding the dynamics of a candidate reference check (Part 1) and creating a strong foundation for a successful call (Part 2), you are now fully prepared to engage in a discussion to yield the greatest value for your hiring decision (Part 3). As you begin your call, a suggested approach:
Set the Tone at the Beginning.
At the onset of the conversation, let the reference know that you are the hiring manager and what your goals are for the call. This will set the tone for the call and put the reference on notice that this will not be a box-checking exercise.
Understand the Relationship Context.
In order to gain the most insight and ask effective questions, you need to know the context of the reference's relationship with the candidate. This should be the first talk thread out of the gate. Is this reference a peer? Manager? Subordinate? How long they've known each other? How often did they work together? What was the context of their working interaction? Can this reference provide a relevant perspective with regard to this candidate? If not, ask the candidate to provide another that meets your requirements.
Lead With the Softballs.
References are standing by to say good things about a candidate during a reference call. So allow them to get all the perfunctory praise off their chests upfront. To kick things off, ask two to three softball questions. Example: “What are Alex's strengths?” “Do you think Alex is a team player?” “Is Alex a hard worker?” This will allow for greater comfort in opening up later when your questions are more nuanced.
Transition to “Smart” Questions.
The best questions are more nuanced-and tease out information rather than serve as blunt instruments. These are not are the standard inquiries like “Would you rehire this candidate?” or “Why did this candidate leave his/her job?”etc. They are nuanced questions that will elicit the “tells” you need. Also note: As you ask your questions and engage, don't over share information about your culture and the qualities you seek-or the lead the reference to provide the answer you want. Keeping things slightly opaque will require the reference to answer the question more reliably rather than telling you what they think you want to hear. Below are a few examples of “smart” questions:
- Tell me a little more about Alex's work style. What type of environment do you think best suits her?
- If I became her manager, in what areas could I best support Alex in her professional development?
- If you have to choose one, which weighs heavier on the scale, Alex's IQ or EQ? Why?
- What type of personality would create conflict with Alex?
- How would you describe Alex's temperament?
- What is the one area you think Alex would like to improve?
- What type of projects/things did Alex get excited about at work?
- How would you describe the % breakdown of Alex's practice?
- Can you give me an example where you've experienced Alex going the extra mile at work?
- What tools does Alex have to deal with conflict?
- Is Alex a detailed or big picture person? Can you give me examples?
- What are three things Alex needs to succeed and thrive in her job?
- Do you know Alex's career aspirations?
- What would drive Alex to leave an organization? What would drive her to stay?
- During your tenure managing Alex, was she ever eligible for a promotion/raise? Did she receive them?
- Would you put your credibility and reputation on the line in recommending Alex? Would there be any caveats?
Checking candidate references does not have to be an exercise in futility. It can be a valuable part of the interviewing process that can confirm doubts, reinforce good feelings or make you think twice. But just how valuable it is, depends on You. As the hiring manager, you have the most to gain … and to lose from your hiring decision. So take the responsibility. And put in the time, thought and effort to ensure the person you hire … is the real deal.
Julie Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Co-Founder and Startup Divorce: Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
'Get Laid Off With Me' on TikTok: What Employers Must Know About This New Trend
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250