Courthouse Exhibit Celebrates The Recorder's Bygone Editorial Cartoons
An exhibit features a decade's worth of editorial cartoons from The Recorder depicting judges from Northern District of California.
December 20, 2017 at 07:14 PM
2 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — Consider it visual evidence that federal judges in the Northern District of California are committed to the First Amendment: Hanging outside the 18th floor library at the federal courthouse at 450 Golden Gate is an exhibit of a decade's worth of editorial cartoons from The Recorder depicting the district's judges—and not always in the most flattering light. The exhibit was the brainchild of the San Francisco District Court library staff, which enlisted the help of frequent cartoon subject U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer for logistical help choosing cartoons and finding funds for framing. "When the bankruptcy court moved in we had to change the entrance to the law library and, in that process, two long bare white walls were erected," said Breyer in an interview this summer shortly after the exhibit was installed. "Whenever I see a blank space on a wall I want to hang a picture and so this provided an opportunity." The court's exhibit features the works of George Riemann, who illustrated cartoons for The Recorder from the early 1990s until the newspaper ceased print publication in September 2016. Riemann estimates that he worked with about a dozen different Recorder editors over the period, first in-person at the paper's offices and then via phone and email once he moved to Germany in 2001. "The editors would come up with an idea and then give it to me in a few lines or sentences by email or phone," said Riemann via email. "While listening on the phone, I would sketch out a very rough scenario, which often stayed pretty much the same until the end." "I think there was only one time in all those years, when I had to call back and say 'This is impossible to get it all into one frame !' " Breyer said that there were probably some judges who either by conduct or appearance lended themselves to Riemann's work more often. "George has a way of getting to the heart of a matter in caricature that's remarkable and tweaks a judge and prods a judge." The exhibit's organizers say it will remain in place indefinitely and visitors are welcome. Below is a sampling of the featured cartoons.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Legal Tech M&As That Changed the Legal Tech Market in 2023
Embracing Innovation: 7 Major Law Firm Tech Developments in 2023
A Hoteling Success Story? A Look Inside Farella's New San Francisco Office
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1T14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
- 2$25M Grubhub Settlement Sheds Light on How Other Gig Economy Firms Can Avoid Regulatory Trouble
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up TikTok's Challenge to Upcoming Ban or Sale
- 4State High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage
- 5Remote Proceedings: A Gift for the Holidays
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250