Ex-Google Engineer Fired Over Memo Launches Class Action Suit
Conservative Bay Area lawyer Harmeet Dhillon is representing James Damore in a class action suit alleging political, gender and race discrimination by Google.
January 08, 2018 at 05:16 PM
5 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — James Damore, the ex-Google software engineer who was fired over a memo in which he argued women are naturally less fit for tech careers, launched a class action lawsuit against the company on Monday alleging political, gender and race discrimination.
The lengthy complaint against Google—161 pages in total, including numerous exhibits with internal company postings—was filed by conservative Bay Area lawyer Harmeet Dhillon in Santa Clara Superior Court. Also named as a lead plaintiff is David Gudeman, who the complaint says worked for Google from 2013 to 2016.
“Google's open hostility for conservative thought is paired with invidious discrimination on the basis of race and gender, barred by law,” the complaint alleges. “Damore, Gudeman, and other class members were ostracized, belittled, and punished for their heterodox political views, and for the added sin of their birth circumstances of being Caucasians and/or males.”
Google said in a statement it looks forward to defending against the suit in court. The company is also facing a separate lawsuit alleging bias against women.
In broad strokes, Damore's suit argues that Google goes out of its way to be accommodating to a diverse range of liberal viewpoints, while actively stifling persons whose views are on the conservative end of the political spectrum. It also contends Google is correcting for a lack of diversity by imposing illegal hiring quotas favoring women and people of color.
At a press conference in San Francisco, Dhillon—an active member of the Republican National Committee—said the suit is not just brought on behalf of white men, but of political conservatives of all stripes that have been “blacklisted” at Google because of their views. The complaint alleges multiple subclasses, including a “political” subclass, a gender subclass for those allegedly discriminated against for being male, and a race subclass for Caucasians.
Harmeet Dhillon
She also characterized the lawsuit as a shot across the bow, saying she hoped that other tech companies took notice of the action. “What's described here is not unique to Google in Silicon Valley,” Dhillon said. “We hope that other tech companies see this complaint, recognize their own behavior, and wake up and stop doing this to people.”
“This is not about money,” she continued. “This is about changing the behavior and the attitude in Silicon Valley, where now, the only acceptable form of discrimination—where everything else is eliminated—is it's OK to disparage, smear, belittle, discriminate [against] conservatives and white men. That's not acceptable.”
Damore was fired by Google after a 10-page memo he authored, titled “Google's Ideological Echo Chamber,” was released publicly and went viral. In it, he argues that there are inherent “biological” differences between men and women that explain the gender gap in tech. He, for example, argues that women on average have more “neuroticism,” which he defines as “higher anxiety, lower stress tolerance.”
Google CEO Sundar Pichai, in a blog post the same day Damore was fired, described those comments as hurtful to other Google co-workers. “To suggest a group of our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to that work is offensive and not OK. It is contrary to our basic values and our Code of Conduct,” Pichai wrote.
While the Damore memo is incorporated in the new complaint, Dhillon's lawsuit focuses more on arguments that Google targeted and blacklisted employees or potential employees because of their conservative political views rather than their views about women. But the two themes blur together.
According to the filing, Gudeman was terminated by Google after posting on internal forums that white men are the “victims of a racist and sexist political movement,” and that liberal wariness over the election of Donald Trump was overblown. Gudeman wrote that anyone “who believes President Trump will be out to get minorities, women or gays has absorbed a lot of serious lies from their echo chamber,” the complaint says.
Gudeman also made comments to a Muslim co-worker who said he had been targeted by the FBI for his faith. The complaint says Gudeman expressed doubt that such an investigation happened, but that if it did, it might have been because the FBI found “something interesting” about the co-worker's recent trip to Pakistan. Google HR then terminated Gudeman, saying he had accused the colleague of terrorism on the basis of his religion.
Dhillon, in the press conference, drew a comparison between the Google's internal practices to promote diversity and the “bogus, B.S. diversity committees” she encountered at big law firms prior to forming her own practice. She said the company should instead try to diversify its ranks by making Google a more attractive place to work for women and minorities.
She also rejected the idea that the separate lawsuit being spearheaded by Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein and Altschuler Berzon—which argues that Google discriminates against women in hiring and pay—cuts against her claims that the company also discriminates against white men.
Damore, who sat next to Dhillon at the press conference, said he did not complain about the alleged discrimination he saw at Google internally prior to writing the memo. “We were sort of brainwashed to believe this was just the normal course of things,” he said. He has been unemployed since his firing, but said he would welcome an opportunity to be re-hired at Google.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
5 minute readCourt rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 2NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 3A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 4Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 5State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250