Bed Bug Infestation Ends in $3.5 Million Jury Verdict
A jury returned a $3.5 million verdict in the lawsuit against a large apartment complex in Los Angeles.
January 11, 2018 at 05:08 PM
3 minute read
It took Southern California lawyer Brian Virag only seven years practicing bed bug law, as he calls it, to score what may be the largest bed bug verdict in the United States.
In the case against Park La Brea, one of the largest apartment complexes in California, a jury returned a verdict of $3.5 million last month for 16 renters whose units were infested with the pests. Though their combined medical costs were roughly $2,200, the jury awarded millions more due to the emotional duress they endured.
“It's really a traumatizing experience to go through bed bugs, because you're living with it,” Virag said. “It affects every portion of your life, from being able to sleep to being able to go to work. You go to work with bites all over your body. It's humiliating; there's a lot of shame involved.”
A representative from Park La Brea did not yet respond to a request for comment. The complex was represented by a team of lawyers from Sedgwick, which closed at the end of last year.
Virag operates his own firm, My Bed Bug Lawyer, that exclusively handles bed bug cases. Just this past fall, he secured a $546,000 verdict for a family who experienced bed bugs for one night in a hotel.
Park La Brea, Virag said, became aware of its bed bug problem in 2008, but the litigation included a period between 2011 and 2013. The apartment complex had an on-site pest control operator, which made recommendations on how to deal with the problem, like educating tenants about the issue and employing specially trained dogs to sniff out the bugs.
But the complex went with its own methods, like chemical treatments, which didn't resolve the problem, Virag said. He said it was that oversight that perhaps struck a chord with the jurors.
“I would think that what the jury was not particularly pleased with was that Park La Brea had the resources to deal with this early on and to try to deal with it in a more effective way and they didn't,” Virag said.
The complex initially tried to settle the case to the tune of $55,000, but Virag said the offer made him think his opponent wasn't “serious about resolving the case.” Once the trial began, Park La Brea increased their offer to $200,000, but Virag again said he didn't bite. He wanted to see what the jury did.
In their Dec. 14, 2017, verdict, the jury awarded each of the tenants between $44,000 and $580,000. Virag said the win was a tribute to the credible plaintiffs he represented and the pain they endured.
“They were such a good group of folks, who all came together to seek justice. They came from all backgrounds, young, old, every place and creed. They all experienced the same thing, and it truly was a David and Goliath type of situation,” Virag said. “I mean, it was my firm—I'm pretty much a sole practitioner or close to it—battling the largest apartment complex west of the Mississippi.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250