Gibson Dunn Signs On for Apple as Plaintiffs Push to Preserve Replaced iPhone Batteries
A team from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher has joined the sprawling suits as plaintiffs seek to force the company to hold onto the batteries it's replacing in a wide-scale effort to address diminished performance in older iPhones.
January 16, 2018 at 03:27 PM
3 minute read
Apple Inc. has brought on a team from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher to help fend off dozens of lawsuits filed across the country claiming the company deliberately slowed the performance of certain older iPhone models to induce consumers to buy new ones.
The Gibson team signed on with Apple as plaintiffs in one of the cases asked a federal judge in San Jose to force the company to hold onto the batteries it's replacing as part of a wide-scale effort to address diminished performance in older devices.
Lawyers at Fazio | Micheletti in San Ramon and DiCello Levitt & Casey in Chicago have asked U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins of the Northern District of California to bar Apple from destroying or altering any battery, iPhone, or diagnostic data it obtains in connection with a program to replace defective lithium-ion batteries at a discount.
The plaintiffs lawyers point out that Apple “hastily” announced its program to replace the batteries in affected iPhones for $29—$50 less than its typical $79 fee—a week after they filed suit.
“Class members are handing over evidence from their iPhones to Apple, without any assurance that Apple will not dispose of the replaced batteries or selectively use and/or dispose of the information gathered as a means of trying to avoid liability,” the lawyers wrote.
Although Gibson lawyers have yet to appear in the suit, the plaintiffs point out in court papers that they've been corresponding with the firm's lawyers on the matter. Gibson previously has taken on high-profile matters for the Cupertino-based tech heavyweight. A team at Gibson led by partner Theodore Boutrous Jr. previously represented the company in its legal showdown with the Justice Department in a case where the FBI was seeking to compel the company to help unlock an encrypted iPhone belonging to one of the perpetrators in the 2015 mass shooting in San Bernardino.
Boutrous and Apple representatives didn't immediately respond to messages Tuesday.
Reached by email Tuesday, Adam Levitt of DiCello Levitt said Apple is obligated to preserve evidence related to pending litigation, and that the company's current policy is to recycle all replaced iPhone batters. Levitt said any failure by Apple to hold onto the batteries at issue in the litigation “would raise serious spoliation concerns.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Pharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute read
'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute read
Old Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
