Snap Inc. GC Michael O'Sullivan to Employees: If You Leak, We May Sue You
"If you leak Snap Inc. information, you will lose your job and we will pursue any and all legal remedies against you. And that's just the start," O'Sullivan wrote in a recent internal memo obtained by the media.
January 19, 2018 at 02:59 PM
3 minute read
Photo credit: Shutterstock.com
Snap Inc. general counsel Michael O'Sullivan, only months into his tenure with the tech company, is putting internal leakers on blast.
A Jan. 8 memo from O'Sullivan to Snap's employees, which says the company has a “zero-tolerance policy” for leakers and mentions lawsuits and jail time for violators, was obtained by financial news network Cheddar, which published it Friday.
The reveal of O'Sullivan's memo comes at a challenging time for the Venice, California-based company, which Cheddar reported on Thursday has laid off nearly two dozen people on eight different teams. The memo itself is dated for the day before the Daily Beast reported the company was struggling to monetize its Discovery feature and that Snap used a culture of intense privacy to keep both employees and investors in the dark. The article sited former and current unnamed Snap employees as sources.
Michael O'Sullivan.In his memo, O'Sullivan wrote that company has “a culture of sharing information across many teams.”
“That includes metrics, financial results, new products and features, potential partnerships, and strategies. We do this to help us do our jobs better, which in turn makes Snap better,” he wrote. “But this information carries a heavy responsibility. Its premature disclosure can significantly harm our business, including our ability to compete.”
O'Sullivan noted that as a publicly traded company, leaked information about Snap could heavily affect stock prices. He informed employees that they were not to speak with any reporters, on or off the record—in fact, they're not allowed to speak about their work with anyone, potentially even co-workers, who isn't explicitly authorized to know that information.
And for employees who don't adhere to Snap's code of silence, O'Sullivan threatens intimidating repercussions.
“If you leak Snap Inc. information, you will lose your job and we will pursue any and all legal remedies against you. And that's just the start,” O'Sullivan wrote. “You can face personal financial liability even if you yourself did not benefit from the leaked information. The government, our investors, and other third parties can also seek their own remedies against you for what you disclosed. The government can even put you in jail.”
O'Sullivan, a former partner at Munger, Tolles & Olson, joined Snap in August 2017, just weeks after his predecessor Chris Handman told employees he'd be leaving for personal reasons.
Snap did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the memo.
➤➤ Get in-house news and commentary straight to your in-box with Inside Track, a new email briefing from Law.com. Learn more and sign up here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 2GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 3Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 4Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 5FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250