Always Asking 'Why?': The Childish Trait That Marks a True Leader
As young children, we begin our quest for the answers to “Why?” It's an innocent curiosity that is present in every encounter, every conversation and every thought. And it's part of the wonder of being a child. Discovering the world and what makes it tick.
February 01, 2018 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
As young children, we begin our quest for the answers to “Why?” It's an innocent curiosity that is present in every encounter, every conversation and every thought. And it's part of the wonder of being a child. Discovering the world and what makes it tick.
As we enter adulthood, this wonder matures and evolves into a deeper intellectual curiosity. It's one of the most important traits we possess—and is key to our professional success, personal happiness and overall fulfillment. But in today's legal profession, the presence of intellectual curiosity has diminished. And not enough professionals look beyond what's in front of them, think deeper … or display an interest in connecting more dots.
So what's driving the decline? For some lawyers, unhappy and unfulfilling careers quash their desire to inquire. Some are in cruise control—content or apathetic with their lot. And others are uninspired by their surroundings and discouraged by the lack of support for their contributions.
Whether your state of mind aligns with the list above or you find yourself elsewhere on the spectrum, turning up the volume on your intellectual curiosity is an exercise that will increase your engagement and enhance the quality of your professional experience. It will also elevate your game and make others take notice. So for those who aspire to learn more, grow more … and be more, I recommend a daily practice of asking “Why?”
It's not exactly a tall order, but one that is prone to neglect. So success requires intent and practice. And the strategy is simple: Each day, pick one topic, one issue, one encounter … one “thing” and pursue additional insight and information. Ask questions and seek answers … beyond the motions, beyond your job description, beyond your pay grade. Because the daily pursuit of Why will broaden your mind, make you a better and happier professional … and strengthen your skills as a leader. For those who need guidance, below are a few topics of inquiry to kick-start your practice:
- How much do know about your current/potential employer? Its financials, investors, culture, competitors? How can you learn more about the industry or profession: Where is it heading? What are the challenges? Where is the opportunity to succeed? How can you discover the bigger picture? Who are the best people to learn from?
- Your current role. How can you make it better? More efficient? Add more value? Where does … and can it fit in the company? What else can you learn to work more effectively? Can it be more? Should it be more?
- Client interactions. How can you enhance the interactions with your clients (internal and external)? What do they care about? What more can you learn about them? What ways can you converse on broader topics, share ideas and collaborate on problem solving? Are there new ways to provide better service?
- People around you. What do they do and how does it fit in to the professional landscape? What makes them tick? How can this understanding help build better and more satisfying partnerships? How can you be of service to others?
- How can you contribute more ideas, thoughts, opinions and solutions in meetings? Set goals for what you want to contribute, learn and accomplish in your meetings.
- Go beyond Internet preparation and understand the big picture and how your background fits in. Bring ideas and an informed perspective to the table.
Intellectual curiosity is a vital piece of the happiness and leadership puzzle. And while professionals tend to focus on tasks to “advance their careers,” this practice is about more money, a bigger title or climbing the corporate ladder. It's about invigorating your mind, learning new things, being engaged and understanding how things work. It's about applying these things to solve problems and lead others. Perhaps most important, it's about being a better person. And from there, personal and professional success will flow … and that … is a wondrous thing.
Julie Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 2Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
- 3Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
- 4Am Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
- 5The Importance of Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and Its Impact on Privilege
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250