On Day 3 of Waymo v. Uber, a Cinematic Moment With Kalanick on the Stand
With the former Uber CEO on the stand, Waymo's lawyer got Michael Douglas' iconic "greed is good" speech from the movie "Wall Street" into evidence.
February 07, 2018 at 06:31 PM
4 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — Michael Douglas' Academy Award-winning performance in “Wall Street” played a supporting role on the third day of the high-profile trade secrets trial between Waymo and Uber.
With former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick on the stand for his second day of testimony, Charles Verhoeven of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan played the iconic “greed is good” speech that Douglas delivered while portraying the fictional corporate raider Gordon Gekko. The video came into evidence via text message Kalanick received in March 2016 from Anthony Levandowski, the former Google engineer at the heart of Waymo's trade secrets case.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California allowed Verhoeven to play the speech despite objections from Uber's lawyer, Karen Dunn of Boies Schiller Flexner, that it would be prejudicial.
“Even if [Kalanick] didn't look at it, Levandowski did and Levandowski is the guy who allegedly stole all the trade secrets,” Alsup said.
Levandowski sent Kalanick the YouTube clip of Douglas' speech while Uber was in negotiations to buy his startup company, Ottomotto. Wrote Levandowski: “Here's the speech you need to give ;-)”
Kalanick sat quietly drinking from a plastic water bottle as the clip played on screens in front of jurors and the packed gallery in Alsup's courtroom. After the clip finished, Verhoeven asked Kalanick if he clicked the link.
“I don't know. I think I would,” Kalanick said. “There's a winky face right there,” he added, pointing to the emoticon Levandowski included in the message.
“It's a famous speech,” said Verhoeven, obviously trying to draw a Gekko-to-Kalanick parallel for jurors.
“It's a movie. It's fake,” Kalanick said.
As entertaining and dramatic as the interlude was, it illustrated part of the difficulty Waymo has had in putting together its case with Levandowski so far asserting his Fifth Amendment right to not testify. Verhoeven's questioning showed that Kalanick was eager to hire Levandowski and move forward in the company's development of autonomous cars. Meeting notes have come into evidence, which claim Kalanick told underlings to go forward with the Ottomotto deal and have the company's legal department find ways to “minimize the pain.”
But under questioning from Boies Schiller's Dunn, the former CEO swore the Ottomotto acquisition had nothing to do with acquiring Google trade secrets.
“We hired Anthony because we felt he was an incredible visionary, a very good technologist, and he was also very charming,” Kalanick said. “Ultimately, self-driving is part of the future and Uber wants to be part of that future.”
Kalanick described how Google initially invested in Uber in 2013—with Google co-founder Larry Page showing up to meet him for a meeting that year in a self-driving car.
“From our perspective that was the relationship,” he said. “It was kind of like little brother with the big brother.”
However Kalanick testified the relationship soon grew strained after Uber began hearing rumors that Google might enter the ride-sharing market in 2014. When Uber started its own autonomous vehicle unit with researchers from Carnegie Mellon University the next year, Kalancik said that Google's Page “made if very clear” that he was “super unhappy. … Unpumped.”
Kalanick said Page told him that Uber was taking Google's IP.
“Your people are not your IP,” Kalanick said he told Page. “If you have an issue on IP, we have very clean processes to make sure that nobody that we hire from your company brings any of your stuff over.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute readK&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
3 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250