Skadden Snags Quinn Emanuel's Trade Secrets Chair
John "Jay" Neukom is leaving Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan to join Skadden in Silicon Valley.
February 08, 2018 at 08:46 PM
4 minute read
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom has recruited John “Jay” Neukom, a former Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan trial lawyer specializing in patent and trade secret disputes, to join the firm's intellectual property litigation group as a partner in Palo Alto, California.
Neukom said he is grateful for the experience he gained at Quinn Emanuel, where he served as head of the firm's trade secrets practice after coming aboard from Mayer Brown in 2012. But Neukom said he was attracted to Skadden because of the firm's client base in Northern California and the opportunity to help the Am Law 100 firm expand its IP litigation practice on the West Coast.
“This is an exciting opportunity to join a world-class firm with a dynamic litigation practice and to help grow Skadden's IP litigation team in Palo Alto,” Neukom said.
Skadden, which closed its San Francisco office in 2010, now has 75 lawyers working out of its sole Bay Area base in Palo Alto. Neukom said he is currently that office's only IP litigator, as longtime Skadden partner James Elacqua retired from the firm in December. (Elacqua, who joined Skadden from Dechert in 2010, served as head of the firm's patent and other complex IP litigation group.)
In stepping in for Elacqua, Neukom joins a group of five IP associates and two counsel in Palo Alto, with additional Skadden IP team members in New York.
“Jay is a terrific addition to our intellectual property litigation practice and to the Palo Alto office,” said a statement by Kenton King, managing partner of Skadden's Palo Alto office. “His industry experience and world-class trial credentials will enhance our scope of services to clients in Silicon Valley and worldwide.”
Neukom is the youngest son of William Neukom III, a longtime general counsel at Microsoft Corp. and former managing general partner of Major League Baseball's San Francisco Giants. The younger Neukom, who helped establish the Neukom Family Foundation, began his legal career in 2005 at Susman Godfrey in Seattle after clerking for U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes.
In 2009, Neukom left Susman Godfrey and briefly worked at Keker, Van Nest & Peters spinoff Durie Tangri and Boies Schiller Flexner before being recruited to Mayer Brown in September 2010.
While at Quinn Emanuel, Neukom had continued to focus much of his practice on patent and trade secrets disputes. He was one of the many lawyers representing Waymo LLC in its high-stakes trade secrets dispute against ride-sharing giant Uber Technologies Inc. over self-driving technologies.
“I felt so lucky to be part of Quinn Emanuel, including its trade secrets group,” Neukom said. “We've all seen, in the market, the increasing importance of trade secret claims in recent years. That's in part because the landscape for patent litigation has changed, but also because parties are recognizing the value of a claim for trade secret misappropriation in federal courts.”
Neukom has also represented a number of other emerging and established technology companies, such as Cisco Systems Inc., Fortinet Inc., Google LLC, HTC Corp. and Koninklijke Philips NV. A Seattle native, Neukom also helped Quinn Emanuel set up an office in the city in 2015, serving as its managing partner before returning to the Bay Area in 2016.
Jenny Durkan, a former federal prosecutor hired by Quinn Emanuel as a white-collar and corporate investigations partner in Seattle and as chair of its cyberlaw and privacy practice, left the firm late last year after being elected mayor of the city.
Quinn Emanuel, which recently elected eight new partners and hired longtime Ropes & Gray litigator Harvey Wolkoff to build out a new Boston office, has watched a few other partners head for the doors in the first few weeks of 2018. Nine partners, led by top litigators Faith Gay and Philippe Selendy, left the firm last month to start their own shop. Neukom declined to discuss their move.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFaegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute readAnapol Weiss Acquires Boutique Led by Star Litigator Alexandra Walsh
5 minute readPierson Ferdinand Lures Veteran M&A Specialist From Sheppard Mullin in Silicon Valley
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250