Waymo, Uber Reach $244.8M Settlement on Driverless Car Trade Secrets
Less than a week into their blockbuster trade secret showdown, Waymo and Uber have settled their dispute over driverless car technology.
February 09, 2018 at 11:22 AM
4 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — Less than a week into their blockbuster trade secret showdown, Waymo and Uber have settled their dispute over driverless car technology.
The parties announced they reached an agreement Friday morning as jaws dropped in a half-full courtroom, on what was set to be a technology-heavy fifth day of trial before U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California.
According to a statement from Waymo, the settlement includes a payment from Uber that includes 0.34 percent of Uber equity—or about $244.8 million in stock based on a $72 billion valuation. Reuters previously reported that Waymo demanded $1 billion in settlement talks last year and had asked Uber for an apology. On Friday, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi expressed “regrets” in a prepared statement, but stopped short of a full-blown apology.
“This case is ancient history,” Alsup told the court with a smile after the settlement was announced.
Alsup then thanked the jury, telling them they were free to “go write a book” about their experience, minus the trade secrets. The judge also asked those gathered to clap for Farella Braun + Martel's John Cooper, the special master in the case who helped referee the parties' discovery disputes, and the already bustling room filled with applause.
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan's Charles Verhoeven, who announced the parties had reached a settlement and moved to dismiss the case with prejudice, thanked Alsup for his devotion to the case.
“[There is] nothing more for me to do in this case, it's done, I think,” Alsup said. “Both sides, I ask you to try to get all your material out of the courtroom so I can move on to the next case.”
Then, as soon as Friday's session had started, it was over. Uber general counsel Tony West was all smiles, but said he couldn't comment on the case or settlement. Boies Schiller Flexner partner Karen Dunn, who represented Uber, was also smiling, saying she'll head back home Saturday.
Arturo González of Morrison & Foerster was one of the last to leave the courtroom, and, also donning a smile, said some members of the jury complimented him upon the case's end. But he too couldn't comment on specifics.
The underlying dispute centered on Uber's acquisition of Ottomotto, an autonomous car company founded by former Google engineer Anthony Levandowski. At trial, Waymo's lawyers from Quinn Emanuel presented evidence that Levandowski had downloaded a trove of 14,000-plus files from Google before he left to form the startup and that he had copied the files to his personal laptop.
In Friday morning's prepared statement, Khosrowshahi said that the acquisition of Otto “made good business sense” at the time, but the “prospect” that Waymo employees might have inappropriately recruited others to join Otto or left with Google files “in retrospect, raised some hard questions.”
“To be clear, while we do not believe that any trade secrets made their way from Waymo to Uber, nor do we believe that Uber has used any of Waymo's proprietary information in its self-driving technology, we are taking steps with Waymo to ensure our Lidar and software represents just our good work,” Khosrowshahi said.
Alsup previously referred the case to the local U.S. Attorney's Office in May for “investigation of possible theft of trade secrets based on the evidentiary record supplied thus far.” Uber later that month fired Levandowski after he refused to testify in the case and asserted his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself.
Levandowski's attorneys, Miles Ehrlich and Ismail Ramsey of Ramsey & Ehrlich, didn't immediately respond to messages Friday morning.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute readK&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
3 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250