MoFo Delivers Record Year for Revenue, Partner Profits
The Bay Area-based Am Law 100 firm saw big gains across the board in 2017.
February 14, 2018 at 09:59 PM
4 minute read
After a year of tepid growth, following another year with a decline in gross revenue, Morrison & Foerster's financial performance spiked to an all-time high in 2017, an outcome that chairman Larren Nashelsky attributed mostly to the firm's investments in key practices and lateral hires.
The Bay Area-based Am Law 100 firm pulled in $1.06 billion in gross revenue last year, a 12.4 percent increase from 2016, surpassing the firm's previous record result by more than $50 million. Revenue per lawyer at the firm jumped 11.9 percent to $1.11 million, and profits per equity partner surged 23.3 percent to $1.74 million. Net income also rose 16.9 percent to $388.8 million.
“We have definitely seen a strong result from the investments we made in both 2016 and the prior year. 2017 was certainly a year where those investments paid dividends,” said Nashelsky, who was a co-chair of the firm's bankruptcy and restructuring practice before being elected to its top leadership role in 2012.
Nashelsky said MoFo laid the foundation for the firm's strong financial performance in 2017 by investing in key lateral hires the two years prior. The firm also expanded in practices such as bankruptcy and restructuring, government contracts, intellectual property litigation, M&A and private equity. A number of MoFo's new recruits started up to pay off in the second half of 2016 and continued to 2017, Nashelsky said, which contributed to the firm's robust growth in 2017.
MoFo's head count remained mostly flat at 960 in 2017, although the firm made nine lateral partner hires, a relatively low number compared to the 28 lateral additions the firm made the previous year. Equity partner head count at MoFo fell to 224, a 3.5 percent decline from 2016, making last year the fifth consecutive year that MoFo shed more equity partners than it added.
“There was nothing unusual,” said Nashelsky, when asked about the firm's equity tier. “When you look at our performance in litigation in 2017, it was just incredible. It was the busiest department in the firm, and we brought in significant laterals in that area, especially IP litigation. There was nothing unnatural in the changes to [the partnership] during that time period.”
Nashelsky noted that 2017 was a record-breaking year for MoFo as the firm made headlines for representing its technology and life sciences industry clients in high-stakes cases, such as defending ride-sharing giant Uber Technologies Inc. in its self-driving technology trade secrets fight with Alphabet Inc.'s auto unit Waymo LLC, which abruptly settled last week; advising SoftBank Group Corp. on its multimillion-dollar deals with Uber and WeWork Cos. Inc.; and representing Toshiba Corp. in the $18 billion sale of its chip business to an investor group led by private equity firm Bain Capital LP.
In June 2017, MoFo scored a major appellate victory for its client Sandoz Inc. as the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of biosimilar developers in a case involving the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
Nashelsky said that MoFo also handled a number of matters outside the technology and life science space, noting that the firm advised Singapore-based warehouse operator Global Logistic Properties Ltd. Private in an $11.6 billion takeover offer from Chinese investors.
In 2018, MoFo will likely continue to focus on growing in the Bay Area and Washington, D.C., as the firm's office in the nation's capital is poised to relocate to 2100 L Street N.W. at the end of 2020. Outside the U.S., the firm hopes to keep building on its presence in Asia and Europe, especially London, where MoFo saw several lawyers decamp for rival Cooley in early 2015.
“We believe that we saw a significant uptick in activity in London,” said Nashelsky, adding that MoFo is keen on strengthening its corporate and finance capabilities in the city.
While none of the 10 lawyers promoted to partner by MoFo in January are based in London, the firm announced this week its hire of Clifford Chance finance partner Caroline Jury in the city.
“That strong year we had has continued in early 2018, and we are really optimistic about what 2018 is going to look like,” Nashelsky said.
The American Lawyer will release its full Am Law 100 report in May.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute readSchools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong's High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
- 2'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
- 3People in the News—Nov. 19, 2024—Pond Lehocky, Duane Morris
- 4Court System's Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission Presents Annual Diversity Awards
- 5Commentary: James Madison, Meet Matt Gaetz
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250