Stanford Law Prof on Mission to Recall Judge Is Sent Suspicious Powder, Threats
Professor Michelle Dauber, on a campaign to oust Judge Aaron Persky following what she and others believe was a light sentence he gave Stanford athlete Brock Turner for sexual assault, says she's experiencing increasing hostility from the judge's supporters.
February 15, 2018 at 11:47 AM
3 minute read
|
Stanford Law School evacuated part of its campus Wednesday after the professor leading the effort to recall Judge Aaron Persky received an envelope containing a suspicious white powder and threatening note.
Authorities later determined that the substance was not harmful, although the university remains focused on the threat and is investigating, according to a statement officials released Wednesday afternoon.
The target of the threat is Michele Dauber, chairwoman of the Recall Persky Campaign.
“Today is not the first time I have received a rape threat focused around my effort to defend sexual assault survivors and recall Judge Aaron Persky,” Dauber said in a statement Wednesday. “It is the first time I received a rape threat accompanied with an unknown white powder that is intended to harm or scare me.”
A friend of Dauber's opened the letter Wednesday morning, which appeared to be a greeting card mailed from Boston, according to a report in the Stanford Daily. Both the friend and Dauber touched the unknown powder. Dauber said she washed her hands and continued her teaching.
Officials closed off two rooms in the law school's Neukom Building while a Santa Clara hazardous materials team tested the white substance, the university said. It was deemed to be “an inert powder that poses no health concern.”
The note read, “Since you are going to disrobe Persky, I am going to treat you like 'Emily Doe'. Let's see what kind of sentencing I get for being a rich white male,” according to Dauber.
“Emily Doe” is a reference to the victim in the case of Brock Turner, the former Stanford athlete who was convicted in 2016 of sexually assaulting an unconscious woman outside a fraternity house. Persky, a Santa Clara Superior Court judge, sentenced Turned to six months in jail, a punishment Dauber and the judge's critics contend was far too lenient.
Dauber said Wednesday that the rhetoric surrounding the recall effort is heated.
“Judge Persky's campaign continues to use hate-filled language and continues to actively defend Brock Turner and attack Emily Doe and me personally,” she said. “The verbal attacks have continued to escalate.”
Last month, the Santa Clara officials ordered the Persky recall to be placed on the ballot in June, thus voters will decide whether he remains on the bench. The recall campaign gathered nearly 95,000 signatures to get the recall before voters.
“Threats intended to silence or intimidate members of our community are absolutely unacceptable at Stanford,” said University Provost Persis Drell.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Agrees to Pay $95 Million Settlement in Siri Voice Assistant Privacy Class Action
Anthropic Agrees to 'Guardrails' for Its AI Training to Protect Copyrighted Lyrics Pending Fight Over Fair Use
4 minute readTexas Insurer Slaps Hinshaw & Culbertson With Legal Mal Claim Over $11 Million Personal Injury Jury Award
3 minute readUS Courts Announce Closures in Observance of Jimmy Carter National Mourning Day
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 2Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 3Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 4Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
- 5Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250