IMDB Ruling Allows Age, Gender Discrimination to Continue
Theoretically, both the Federal and California governments have laws in place to protect any and all employees of age discrimination.
March 01, 2018 at 12:45 PM
5 minute read
Theoretically, both the Federal and California governments have laws in place to protect any and all employees of age discrimination. Congress passed the Age Discrimination in Employment Act in 1967 which prohibits employers from discriminating against older workers. California passed FEHA, the Fair Employment and Housing Act, which also protects workers aged 40 or older from discriminatory workplace or hiring practices. However, it seems Hollywood did not get the memo, and a recent court ruling may have just made things worse.
In IMDb.com v. Becerra, 16-CV06535 (N.D. Cal., filed Nov. 10, 2016), federal Judge Vince Chhabria of the Northern District of California ruled that AB 1687, which compelled the website IMDb.com (owned by Amazon) to remove the age of an actor upon request, was unconstitutional. The judge ruled that preventing IMDb, or any site, from putting information out because there was the possibility of discrimination “would enable states to forbid publication of virtually any fact.” Herein lies one of the core problems facing women when battling discrimination—how can they battle discrimination when they do not even have control of information being published about them?
The law was designed to help prevent discrimination against primarily actresses who can often miss out on roles as a result of their age. After SAG-AFTRA, the union for actors in film and television, lobbied hard to get the law passed, its president added a powerful personal story. Gabrielle Carteris insisted that she might not have been cast in “Beverly Hills 90210” had her actual age been known at the time. For all of its self-congratulating, Hollywood was practically founded upon gender and age discrimination. While male actors can play the leading man well into their senior years (see Harrison Ford), women face a much steeper climb to get cast as they age. A humorous clip from the “Amy Schumer Show” featured Schumer and actresses Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Tina Fey and Patricia Arquette toasting the end of Louis-Dreyfus' sex appeal and what that would mean for her. Past a certain age, women are no longer considered leads in almost any sort of film, especially any large blockbusters. Working in such an environment limits a woman's options, and when the California legislature attempted to pass a law to help protect women's rights and prevent discrimination, the court was more than disagreeable.
After the ruling, a SAG-AFTRA spokesperson said, “The court unfortunately fails to understand or recognize the massive impact gender and age discrimination has on all working performers. That discrimination is facilitated by IMDb's insistence on publishing performers' age information without their consent.” Not only are these women being discriminated against due to their age and gender, but they have now been left powerless by the court to do anything about the discrimination. This is not a new issue; in fact, at a press conference in 2006, Oscar winning actress Meryl Streep said: “What films have you seen lately with serious roles for 50-year-old women in the lead?”
What does justice look like for women who have spent the last 100 years being treated like replaceable parts on the Hollywood conveyer belt?
A recent study done on films dating from 1920 to 2011 found that women in their early 20s had an 80 percent chance of a leading role compared to men; however, past the age of 40 men claim 80 percent of leading roles while women only get 20 percent. Women already face proven discrimination based upon their gender; to then be hampered by their age is a powerful injustice.
Attorneys can truly commiserate with actors as we have our own frustrations with online profile companies such as AVVO, which publishes attorney profiles without the permission of those attorneys. AVVO was valued at roughly $650 million before it was purchased by Internet Brands, so the online profile business is a profit one. With movie trailers, entertainment news and more, IMDb occupies a niche yet lucrative space on the Internet. According to Alexa.com, a website that gives out information on web traffic, IMDb is the 52nd most popular website in the world, and Ahrefs.com pegs the monthly traffic at 609 million visitors. Listing the age of an actress perpetuates age discrimination, especially when the culture of Hollywood casting has proven itself to be permanently entrenched over the last century.
One hopes that an appeal is in the works, or that the law could possibly be reworked so that the scope is a bit narrower. However, if an appeal does not overturn this ruling, or the legislature isn't up to the task of fixing the law, women in Hollywood will instead have to rely on a serious, long-lasting culture change at every Hollywood studio.
Alexis S. McKenna, a partner at the Oakland-based plaintiffs' firm Winer McKenna & Burritt, is dedicated to social justice and protecting the rights of individuals. She represents workers and consumers against corporations and insurance companies in the fields of personal injury and employment law including sexual harassment and discrimination.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
3 minute readUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 2Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
- 3While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 4The Definition of Special Employment
- 5People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250