Coinbase Hit With Class Action Claiming Insiders Benefited From 'Bitcoin Cash' Launch
The company is accused of tipping off employees to the launch of trading in Bitcoin Cash on its exchange, allowing regular investors to be ripped off.
March 02, 2018 at 06:49 PM
3 minute read
Coinbase is facing a new lawsuit alleging that its employees and other insiders reaped huge gains by trading on nonpublic information that the cryptocurrency exchange planned to support transactions in a Bitcoin offshoot called Bitcoin Cash.
The class action suit, filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, appears to be the first filed in a federal court alleging insider trading-like claims over Coinbase's announcement that it would handle transactions in Bitcoin Cash last December.
According to the complaint, insiders drove up the price of Bitcoin Cash, also called BCH, by executing buy and sell orders moments after the move by Coinbase—one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world.
The activity caused the value of the cryptocurrency to spike by 200 percent in the minutes after trading opened on Dec. 19, the complaint adds. That led Coinbase to temporarily freeze trading, and remaining Bitcoin Cash purchasers were forced to pay “artificially inflated prices that had been manipulated well beyond the fair market value of BCH at that time,” it alleges.
The complaint also says that, while Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has publicly acknowledged suspicions of insider trading and pledged to undertake an internal investigation, “to date, neither Armstrong nor the company has disclosed the result of its purported investigation.”
The complaint was filed by Green & Noblin in Larkspur, California, and by The Grant Law Firm in New York. The named plaintiff, Jeffrey Berk, is an Arizona resident who alleges that his buy order for BCH was executed at roughly double the price as when he submitted it.
Coinbase did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment about the lawsuit.
Although the complaint makes insider trading-like allegations, it cites California's Unfair Competition Law and common law negligence as causes of action—likely due to the fact that BCH is not currently regulated as a security. The Commodities Futures Trading Corp. has said that Bitcoin is a commodity.
BCH was created last year by what is known as a “hard fork” of the Bitcoin blockchain—the creation of a variant of the original software. According to the complaint, Coinbase initially suggested it would not handle transactions in BCH. The company later said it would begin supporting some transactions in BCH in January 2018 but then abruptly changed course by opening trading on Dec. 19, the complaint alleges.
In a subsequent blog post, a senior Coinbase manager wrote that employees were notified about a month ahead of time that support for trading in BCH was coming. Those employees “were explicitly prohibited from buying and selling BCH,” he added. “All employees were also barred from sharing this information with anyone outside of Coinbase.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readNetflix Music Guru Becomes First GC of Startup Helping Independent Artists Monetize Catalogs
2 minute readK&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
3 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250