Revenue Inches Up at O'Melveny as Partner Profits Top $2M
The firm kept on a growth trajectory in 2017, though its revenue engine cooled from the prior two years.
March 02, 2018 at 05:07 PM
5 minute read
O'Melveny & Myers posted modest gains in revenue and partner profits in 2017, with profits per partner exceeding $2 million. The firm's top line growth cooled somewhat from the two prior years even as head count continued to expand last year.
Gross revenue at the Los Angeles-based firm increased 1.7 percent, reaching $738 million in 2017. Profits per partner saw a 3.1 percent increase from 2016, reaching $2.01 million. Net income dropped by 1.6 percent, from $340.9 million to $335.4 million last year.
Revenue per lawyer was relatively flat at $1.12 million, just a hair below O'Melveny's record year in 2016.
“We had some major litigation matters that we settled or tried to verdict at the end of 2016, and some corporate matters that either closed or didn't proceed,” said Bradley Butwin, O'Melveny's New York-based chair, explaining the moderate growth last year. “So the first three-and-a-half months was a period where we were replenishing the pipeline, and many new matters across the firm then kept us extremely busy for the rest of the year.”
Butwin said the firm's year-end inventory was up by 13 percent last year. Some of the inventory has already converted to cash at the beginning of the year, which could contribute to greater revenue growth this year, he added.
“We got really busy a little bit later in the year than we sometimes do,” he said.
Butwin said the firm has continued its momentum in both litigation and corporate work into this year. For example, O'Melveny is lead trial counsel for AT&T and Time Warner in the Department of Justice lawsuit seeking to block the companies' $85 billion merger, which is headed for trial March 19. On the corporate side, the firm's lawyers represent Puerto Rico's fiscal advisory agency in the financial restructuring of the island's debt obligations, a bankruptcy-like process to help the government grapple with more than $70 billion in public-sector debt.
Just Friday, the firm said it had been tapped to advise longtime deal client Microsemi in its $10.15 billion sale to Microchip Technology.
Butwin cited strong performance in a number of other areas in which O'Melveny has invested in over the last few years, including its new sports law practice, its infrastructure group, and other practices such as health care, driverless cars, Fintech, cybersecurity and California water rights.
O'Melveny expanded its total lawyer head count last year from 648 to 660, including at least nine lateral partner hires. The firm, which says it is structured as a single-tier partnership, had three fewer partners overall in 2017.
Notable hires last year included former DLA Piper corporate partner Charles “Chuck” Baker and former Foley corporate partner Irwin Raij, who now co-chair the firm's sports industry group from its base in New York, and Steve Bunnell, former general counsel of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, who became co-chair of O'Melveny's data security and privacy practice in Washington, D.C. Competition law partner Philip Monaghan joined from the Hong Kong Competition Commission, and in San Francisco, the firm brought back ex-prosecutor and former counsel Damali Taylor as a partner in its white-collar defense and corporate investigations practice.
New partners are categorized as fixed income partners for their first year, Butwin said, which partly explains why nonequity compensation almost doubled from $5.66 million in 2016 to about $11 million in 2017.
In February, O'Melveny added three more new partners, David M. Smith, Robert Graffum and Nicolai Schwarz-Gondek, to its M&A practice in Century City, California.
According to data provided by the firm, O'Melveny's Century City office saw a decline of 24 lawyers over the four years from 2013 to 2017, from 80 to 56, though head count there now stands at 67 lawyers. The Los Angeles office also declined by three lawyers within the four year period, to 156 lawyers, but L.A. head count has since climbed to 179, according to the firm.
In New York, the firm said, head count since 2013 grew by 44 lawyers to 142 in 2017, and now stands at 159 lawyers.
“We work as one O'Melveny across multiple offices. We don't staff cases office by office but by expertise,” said Butwin, regarding the numbers. He added that the firm does not have a plan to open a new office in the near future.
“Our strategy is always focused on what the clients need,” said Butwin. “When we focus on regions and strategy, it is always based on what our clients are telling us, and what we are hearing from the clients is that they are pleased with what we offer and where we are.”
Note: This story has been updated to reflect attorney head count figures for Century City, L.A. and New York provided by the firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFaegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute readAnapol Weiss Acquires Boutique Led by Star Litigator Alexandra Walsh
5 minute readPierson Ferdinand Lures Veteran M&A Specialist From Sheppard Mullin in Silicon Valley
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250