Coinbase Hit With Class Action Over Unclaimed Cryptocurrency
The lawsuit filed March 2 marks the second time in as many days that the company has been hit with a class action in the Northern District of California.
March 05, 2018 at 06:19 PM
2 minute read
Coinbase has been hit with a proposed class action lawsuit claiming the San Francisco-based digital currency exchange has unlawfully held onto some unclaimed cryptocurrency that account holders have routed to others' email addresses.
The lawsuit, filed March 2 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by San Diego lawyer William Restis, claims that Coinbase, which allows its account holders to send cryptocurrencies to a recipient's email address, has violated California's Unclaimed Property Law by failing to deliver cryptocurrencies to some people who didn't already have Coinbase accounts.
“Imagine writing a cashier's check to a friend,” wrote Restis, in the introduction of the 13-page complaint. “The bank withdraws funds from your account, but your friend never cashes the check. Does the bank get to keep the funds? The law clearly says no. But this is exactly what has happened with cryptocurrencies sent through Coinbase.com, owned and operated by Coinbase Inc.”
The name plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Timothy Faasse and Jeffrey Hansen, claim that they were sent 0.1 and 0.01 bitcoin respectively via Coinbase to their email addresses in 2013. According to the complaint, the two men were reminded about the transfers in February of this year, but when they tracked down the old emails from Coinbase, the links provided within them were broken. Restis estimates in the complaint that there are “thousands” of people in the same position as the name plaintiffs and seeks to certify a class of anyone who was sent cryptocurrency by email via Coinbase who never claimed it.
The suit claims that Coinbase has failed to provide the required notice to the plaintiffs under California's Unclaimed Property Law, which requires financial services companies to alert owners of unclaimed property between two- and two-and-a-half years after a transfer of property. The lawsuit also brings a claim under California's Unfair Competition Law and a common law claim of conversion.
The unclaimed property suit landed just a day after Coinbase was hit with a separate proposed class action alleging that Coinbase employees and others made big gains by trading on insider information that the company would support transactions in Bitcoin Cash, a bitcoin offshoot.
Coinbase representatives didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the new suit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Apple Agrees to Pay $95 Million Settlement in Siri Voice Assistant Privacy Class Action
Anthropic Agrees to 'Guardrails' for Its AI Training to Protect Copyrighted Lyrics Pending Fight Over Fair Use
5 minute read
Texas Insurer Slaps Hinshaw & Culbertson With Legal Mal Claim Over $11 Million Personal Injury Jury Award
3 minute read
US Courts Announce Closures in Observance of Jimmy Carter National Mourning Day
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
