Top In-House Tech Lawyers Explain Why They Are Taking the FCC to Court on Net Neutrality
Top lawyers at Expa, Shutterstock and Automattic told Corporate Counsel why their companies are challenging the FCC.
March 06, 2018 at 03:50 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The pile of lawsuits against the Federal Communications Commission over its decision to overturn Obama-era net neutrality regulations has grown, with big-name technology companies banding together to file a petition in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Monday.
Foursquare, Kickstarter, Automattic, Etsy, Expa and Shutterstock filed the action as members of the Coalition for Internet Openness, a pro-net neutrality group. They are challenging the FCC, which back in December opted to overturn the 2015 Open Internet Order, a set of rules that require internet service providers to treat all content equally without blocking or slowing down access to specific sites.
General counsel from several of the companies involved in bringing the action spoke to Corporate Counsel on Tuesday about why they decided to take the leap.
➤➤ Get in-house news and commentary straight to your inbox with Inside Track by Stephanie Forshee. Learn more and sign up here.
“Any time an agency puts out an order or a rule the Administrative Procedure Act generally and the Communications Act specifically lay out the procedure for a court to review those actions,” Expa general counsel Michal Rosenn told Corporate Counsel. “So we worked with Steptoe & Johnson, which represents the coalition, and put together a petition.”
Rosenn, who moved to Expa from Kickstarter in November 2017, said Expa and a number of companies have been discussing next steps since the FCC's vote to overturn net neutrality late last year.
“A number of us wanted to continue our forms of action to file this petition for the court to review the FCC's latest order,” Rosenn said. “It was primarily Etsy and Kickstarter and us working on that, reaching out to other companies and filing a petition.”
Etsy also plans to file its own separate petition in the D.C. Circuit, according to the Coalition for Internet Openness.
As for Shutterstock GC Heidi Garfield, she says her company has had an “avid interest” in defending net neutrality since the FCC's decision, and joined the plan to petition a few weeks ago.
Both she and Rosenn said their involvement in the suit stems, at least in part, from a desire to help their platforms' users. Expa is a network of entrepreneurs that links startups to resources and funding, and Shutterstock allows photographers to post stock photos online. Their users are competing for internet traffic with larger companies and artists, and usually don't have pockets as deep as their competitors'.
“Expa is a startup studio so we help the best entrepreneurs bring their ideas to life. We help them get resources and create, so those are exactly the people who depend most on an open internet, [those] looking to start new companies and explore new ways to challenge incumbent companies to bring new options to users and consumers everywhere,” Rosenn said. “The only way they are able to succeed is if they are able to compete on a level playing field with the biggest companies.”
If users can't financially compete to provide fast internet speeds to those who want access to their products or prevent their sites from being blocked, it could hurt both creators and businesses like Shutterstock, Garfield said.
“Repealing rules related to net neutrality could have a domino effect—reduction in content creation, reduction in ad dollars, reduction in access, rights and opportunities at every step of the chain,” she explained.
Paul Sieminski, the GC of Automattic Inc., says he's also heard concerns from content creators. Automattic is well known for WordPress.com, which houses writing and blog posts from around the world. Sieminski says Automattic has spoken to representatives in Congress, which could still overturn the FCC's decision, and chose to join the petition as further action to restore net neutrality.
“Our users, who are by and large smaller publishers, smaller bloggers, small businesses, they use our business to set up an online store,” he said. “[These] people and businesses you can see being disadvantaged by a system where you essentially have to pay to access your end users.”
He said it's not clear how long it will take for the court to decide whether or not it will overturn the FCC's vote to repeal net neutrality, but it could be around a year. All three GCs said they hope the suit leads to a restoration of 2015's net neutrality laws.
“We're doing it for our own interests, but also the interests of all of our users and everybody, really, who cares about the internet being open,” Sieminski said.
This group of companies and their GCs are not the first to take legal action against the FCC over net neutrality. New York-based video sharing website Vimeo Inc., whose GC Michael Cheah is a vocal net neutrality advocate, filed a suit against the FCC in February alongside Mozilla Corp.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
5 minute read'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
Patreon Hit With Lawsuit for Allegedly Diverting Subscriber Data to Meta
TikTok Hit With California Class Action for Allegedly Mining Children's Data Without Parental Consent
Trending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250