Bay Area's In-House Lawyers Find Collaborative, Cross-Company Communities
“The bar is high in the Bay because we don't have to start each conversation at a higher level. We understand each other,” said one legal ops leader.
March 09, 2018 at 12:09 PM
5 minute read
(Photo: kropic1/Shutterstock.com)
It's a Tuesday night, and the top floor of a bar in San Francisco's SoMa neighborhood is filled with lawyers. Most people are dressed casually in jeans, and there's a puppy on the couch. It's a happy hour event hosted by the Bay Area In-House Lawyers group, and while it's casual and laid back, attendees are exchanging real career advice, discussing job openings and moves and making authentic connections with other corporate counsel.
It's not an unusual scene in the Bay Area, where in-house attorneys, many of whom work for technology companies, have formed especially tight-knit communities that have helped them share knowledge and grow in their careers. The ability to reach outside the usual realm of their own legal departments to make contacts and exchange best practices has propelled them forward.
“It's a fantastic vibrant community,” Jobe Danganan, chair of the in-house counsel section of the Bar Association of San Francisco and new general counsel of Credible, said of the Bay Area. “We collaborate and learn from each other. It's a healthy environment for in-house lawyers to thrive in.”
BAIL and the in-house counsel section of BASF are two of many organizations that connect corporate counsel in the Bay Area. Those connections are helpful, Danganan says, for in-house lawyers looking to make informed decisions.
“It's incredibly helpful for in-house counsel dealing with outside lawyer firms, dealing with employees, dealing with leadership teams, and beyond that,” he said.
➤➤ Get in-house news and commentary straight to your in-box with Inside Track from Law.com. Learn more and sign up here.
Danganan praised BASF's practical tools, such as its listserv. “People post general questions, open-ended questions that don't disclose the issues within the company, but it's a collaborative community where folks can help each other,” he noted.
These communities on the Bay's legal landscape can be especially useful for smaller legal departments and younger in-house lawyers who are just starting out, according to Linsey Morrison, associate general counsel, product and policy at Eventbrite.
Morrison has worked in-house since 2005, right after graduating from UC Hastings College of the Law, and she's seen many newer corporate counsel benefit from the resources available.
“I've always found it very collaborative. It probably stems from the fact that there's a lot of smaller companies out here willing to take a lot of newer attorneys in-house,” Morrison said. “Younger attorneys in-house are doing a variety of things without a huge legal department, so it becomes a necessity to reach out to a lot of attorneys in the same position and luckily in the Bay you find that.”
Even as she has become a more-seasoned lawyer, Morrison has been able to ask in-house lawyers at other tech companies for advice when her work raises new and unfamiliar legal questions. Facing these quandaries is fairly common in the region, where many tech attorneys are working in cutting edge areas that may lack fully formed legal and regulatory frameworks.
The collaborative environment and high density of tech companies and lawyers has also helped grow a community for those in legal operations—an increasingly important part of many in-house teams. Connie Brenton, chief of staff and director of Legal Operations at NetApp Inc. and president and chief executive officer of Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC), says that the legal ops community has taken off especially quickly in the Bay.
“Collaborations and sharing of best practices and creativity is part of the DNA of the Bay Area, part of the DNA of most of the companies, and so it's an extension of that culture and that mindset as CLOC started to develop,” Brenton said. “There wasn't fear, there wasn't a lot of holding information close to the chest, we really wanted to help each other create efficient legal departments. It's a win-win.”
Now, Brenton says the Bay Area's community feel and early adoption of CLOC has allowed the legal ops field to grow, increasing the number of people trained in operations and the confidence in those working in the role.
“We've been meeting with each other for 10 years. There's a lot of history and trust and sharing of best practices,” she said. “The bar is high in the Bay because we don't have to start each conversation at a higher level. We understand each other. We understand each others' businesses, we've shared documents and processes for long periods of time. It's like having a friend that you grew up with.”
That's not to say the Bay Area is the only place where in-house attorneys have formed close communities. Since CLOC began, the group has spread across the U.S. and to other countries. On a national scale, there are groups such as In The House, which connects in-house lawyers nationwide for networking and knowledge sharing, leveraging the power of group text chats, video sessions and other tech. New York-based groups TechGC and New York Legal Tech Meetup are working to form their own strong in-house communities.
“We do want to help eliminate those [geographical] boundaries to networking with other in-house counsel,” said Chris Colvin, the general counsel and founder of In The House. “It's equally valuable to reach out and connect with people in different geographies who might share your niche.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250