FinTech Company Hit With 6-Figure SEC Penalty for Faulty Stock Option Disclosures
San Francisco-based Credit Karma, a pre-IPO financial technology company, agreed to pay a $160,000 penalty after the SEC found that it failed to offer employees financial statements and risk disclosures in conjunction with company-offered stock options.
March 13, 2018 at 04:15 PM
3 minute read
San Francisco-based Credit Karma has agreed to pay a $160,000 penalty after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission found that the pre-initial public offering financial technology company failed to make proper disclosures to employees about its stock option plan.
Credit Karma, a company that helps consumers monitor their credit and provides them with personalized financial recommendations, issued approximately $13.8 million in stock options to its employees from October 2014 to September 2015, according to the cease-and-desist order obtained by the SEC Monday.
According to the SEC, Credit Karma didn't register its stock options with the agency, but rather attempted to rely on an exemption provided under Securities Act Rule 701, a provision allowing privately held companies to pay employees with up to $5 million worth of securities without incurring registration and reporting requirements.
Since the value of Credit Karma stock options had exceeded the $5 million amount, the SEC claims that the company was required “to deliver financial statements and risk disclosures associated with the securities,” something the agency said the company made available for potential institutional investors, but not its own employees.
“Registration requirements exist to ensure that all investors have access to important information before deciding to invest,” Jina Choi, director of the SEC's San Francisco regional office, said in a statement. “This is equally true for employees who are investors in the companies where they work.”
Emily Donahue, a spokeswoman for Credit Karma, said in an email that the company's head count grew by a factor of five to support an additional 20 million customers from 2014 to 2017.
“All new employees were offered equity and, given the value of the equity, we triggered a requirement to provide equity holders with certain financial information and disclosures,” Donahue said. She added that the company has “been in full compliance since mid-2016,” something also noted in Monday's cease-and-desist order.
Credit Karma was represented in the administrative proceeding by Caz Hashemi of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. The SEC's investigation was conducted by Kashya Shei and Carlos Vasquez in the San Francisco regional office. The case was supervised by Jeremy Pendrey, an assistant regional director with the SEC's Asset Management Unit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Not a Regulatory Gray Area’: CFTC Secures $5M Settlement From Gemini
3 minute readLawsuit alleges Fox Sports ex-host harassed hairstylist and offered her $1.5M for sex
3 minute readProskauer, Cleary, O’Melveny, Sidley Add Laterals, as New Year Opens With Movement
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DC's Birchstone Moore Combines With Chicago-Founded Wealth Planning Firm
- 2White Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
- 3Braverman Greenspun Acquires NY Real Estate Boutique
- 4Winston & Strawn Snags Sidley Austin Cross-Border Transactions Partner in Miami
- 5U.S. Attorney Markenzy Lapointe Stepped Down
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250