Weedmaps Turns to 'Section 230' Defense Against Regulators
Tech companies find some comfort in protections accorded by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Weedmaps, which helps consumers connect with marijuana dispensaries, is the latest to throw up that shield in the face of regulators.
March 16, 2018 at 04:47 PM
4 minute read
Weedmaps, the popular online marijuana dispensary locator, has turned to a familiar shield to fend off a cease-and-desist threat from state regulators: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
Earlier this month, California's Bureau of Cannabis Control disclosed it had ordered Weedmaps to stop running ads from sellers that don't hold and display registered California license numbers. Weedmaps executives fired back this week, saying that while they're willing to work with the regulators, the state has no legal authority to sanction them.
“Weedmaps is a technology company and an interactive computer service which is subject to certain federally preemptive protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act,” Doug Francis, the company's CEO, and general counsel Chris Beals wrote in a letter to Lori Ajax, chief of the Bureau of Cannabis Control.
What's more, they wrote, Weedmaps “ is not a licensee subject to the bureau's purview.”
The flare-up between state regulators and the Orange County company known as the Yelp for pot consumers is symptomatic of the larger problem California faces trying to bring a once-illicit industry into a regulated market.
A February report by California Growers Association concluded that fewer than 1 percent of marijuana cultivators in the state have obtained licenses. The report cited high taxes, worries about Internal Revenue Service audits, prohibitions by cities and counties and costly licensing fees as just some of the issues keeping growers out of the regulated system.
Meanwhile, licensed retailers have complained to the Cannabis Advisory Committee, an appointed group advising the bureau on writing final regulations due later this year, that black-market operations are freely advertising through outlets such as Weedmaps and undercutting their tax-paying businesses.
Two lawmakers this week tried to address licensees' concerns about high taxes by introducing legislation that would suspend the state's $148-per-pound levy on cultivation for three years and lower the excise tax from 15 percent to 11 percent over the same time period. State Sen. Bob Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, offered amendments to a different bill addressing marijuana businesses' lack of access to banking. SB 930 would license “cannabis limited charter banks” under state regulation.
In their letter, Francis and Beals blamed the prevalence of unlicensed businesses on “a regulatory landscape that is so blurry it stifles investment.”
“Scrubbing the internet of the reality of unlicensed operators that have created thousands of jobs over the last 20 years does nothing to fix the underlying issues,” they wrote. “It is simply opening a new face of 'whack-a-mole' when the ultimate cause is broken policy.”
Santa Clara University School of Law professor Eric Goldman said Weedmaps may have a Section 230 defense from state prosecution “even if those ads promote illegal activity or themselves are illegal.”
“However, if the federal government enforces federal criminal law against Weedmaps, Section 230 won't apply,” Goldman added. “Furthermore, states may be able to find other legal theories to hold website operators accountable for illegal third party ads. For example, the California Attorney General is prosecuting the operators of Backpage for money laundering, and the court ruled that Section 230 did not apply to those charges.”
Bureau of Cannabis Control spokesman Alex Traverso said officials are “having internal discussions about what the appropriate next steps are.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250