VR and AR Companies More Worried About Legal Risks, Perkins Coie Survey Shows
A poll by the law firm Perkins Coie showed a lot more concern over data privacy, health and safety, and IP issues compared with a year and a half ago.
March 20, 2018 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Virtual and augmented reality companies are much more worried about legal risks—especially relating to data privacy, safety and IP—than they were a year and a half ago, according to new survey results released by Perkins Coie.
In a report released Tuesday, the law firm said 44 percent of the individuals it polled responded that “consumer privacy/data security” was a legal risk of concern to their organization. That's a big jump up from just 15 percent the last time Perkins Coie conducted the poll in September 2016.
“Product liability/health and safety issues” were also cited as a concern by 42 percent of respondents, up from 18 percent in the last survey. And 40 percent of those polled responded that “intellectual property infringement” was a legal concern, up from just 16 percent the last time around.
Jason Schneiderman, a partner at the firm's Palo Alto, California, office and a contributing author to the report, interpreted the results as a sign of a “more mature marketplace” for VR, AR, and “mixed reality” (MR) technologies.
In the earlier stages of the industry, many companies were simply trying to get their technology off the ground, he said. “But once some of them start to get legs and actually develop something, then they get to sort of move downstream on their worry list,” Schneiderman said.
He also said many in the industry see it becoming less collaborative, and fear greater consolidation will lead to more battles for turf. He was skeptical that the $500 million verdict against Facebook in a lawsuit over the Oculus Rift had much to do with the uptick, noting that many elements of that dispute were very unique to Facebook.
Among the 140 respondents—most of whom were executives at VR, AR, MR or other tech companies—61 percent of the respondents said patent litigation was most likely to drive intellectual property related disputes in the industry. (The last survey didn't have this category.)
“Technology and IP licensing” was cited as a concern by 30 percent of respondents, up from 19 percent in the last survey. “Licensing is a slippery slope. The industry is in its early stages; there are bound to be screw-ups,” the report quoted one anonymous VR startup developer as saying.
The only category in which there was less concern over legal risk was “export control issues,” which fell to 6 percent compared with 8 percent in 2016.
Eyeing broader industry trends, most respondents still saw gaming as the sector likely to draw the most investment. “But gaming's lead position was not as strong in 2018, with retail, military and defense, and real estate among the areas making gains,” the report said.
Respondents identified “user experience”—bulky hardware, technological limitations or glitches—as the biggest obstacle to mass adoption of VR and AR technology, a finding consistent with last year's report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Texas-Based Ferguson Braswell Expands in California With 6-Lawyer Team From Orange County Law Firm
2 minute readJustin Baldoni Sues Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds for $400M in New Step in 'It Ends With Us' Fight
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250