In Wake of Cambridge Analytica Saga, Class Actions Roll in Against Facebook
The social media giant was hit with a pair of class action lawsuits Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
March 21, 2018 at 05:52 PM
3 minute read
The inevitable legal blowback from Facebook's Cambridge Analytica episode has begun.
The social media giant was hit with a pair of class action lawsuits Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
First, lawyers at Pomerantz filed a stock-drop lawsuit against Facebook, CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and CFO David Wehner, claiming the company misled shareholders about its own data privacy policies and the possibility of the company coming under heightened regulatory scrutiny. Then, a trio of law firms—Sacramento's Clayeo C. Arnold, A Professional Law Corporation, Jacksonville, Florida's Abbott Law Group, and Tampa's Morgan & Morgan—brought claims that Cambridge Analytica and Facebook violated Facebook users' privacy rights and California's Unfair Competition Law.
“Facebook, for its part, knew this improper data aggregation was occurring and failed to stop it, or actively avoided discovering such knowledge in order to profess supposed ignorance,” wrote the privacy lawyers, including Morgan & Morgan's John Yanchunis, who is serving as lead counsel in the multidistrict litigation targeting Yahoo with claims related to its massive data breach.
In response to the lawsuits, a Facebook spokeswoman provided a statement from Paul Grewal, Facebook's vice president and deputy general counsel. “We are committed to vigorously enforcing our policies to protect people's information. We will take whatever steps are required to see that this happens,” Grewal said.
Earlier this week, Grewal said on the company's blog that Facebook suspended the app in 2015 that passed data along to Cambridge Analytica, a voter-profiling firm closely associated with President Donald Trump's campaign. Grewal wrote that Cambridge Analytica and the app creators had certified at the time that they destroyed the harvested data.
In a phone interview Wednesday, Yanchunis questioned why it took reporting by the media for Facebook to come forward with that information.
“It's funny how companies in Facebook's position become advocates of their consumers' rights when something is outed in the public press or a lawsuit is filed,” he said. “My concern is for the 500 million consumers who use Facebook: What guarantee do we have that this won't happen again?”
On top of the private lawsuits, Facebook is reportedly facing investigations from several states attorneys general and the Federal Trade Commission.
When asked about what the private lawyers would add to mix, Yanchunis chuckled.
“I don't mean to laugh. This isn't my first privacy case,” Yanchunis said. “I believe that lawyers who practice in this area have been much more effective in enforcing the rights of consumers than regulators.”
Jennifer Pafiti of Pomerantz, one of the lawyers handling the securities suit, didn't respond to a message seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuchalter Hires Longtime Sheppard Mullin Real Estate Partner as Practice Chair
Reality TV Couple and Pacific Palisades Neighbors Sue City of Los Angeles Over Loss of Homes to Fire
3 minute readIn Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250